Use of ACL in Audits & Investigations Lon S. Heuer, A, CIA Associate Vice President for Institutional Compliance and Director, Office of Internal Audits
Dyan G. Hudson, CISA Associate Director, Office of Internal Audits
Agenda Overview of Generalized Audit Software How to Get Started Getting Basic File Information Looking for Anomalies Detailed Transaction Analysis Example – Procurement Card Case Study
Overview What does it do? Allows auditors to extract and analyze data independent of programmers and auditees Summarizes large amounts of data 100% testing of large populations
– Increases probability of detecting errors and omissions – Increases probability of detecting fraud
Getting Started Know Your Data!
Know where to get it – Platform (PC/mainframe/other) and format – Quantity and extract options – Knowledgeable staff
Know what it should look like – Important fields – Statistical expectations
Check key fields for validity – Numeric / alphanumeric – Blank / non-blank – Valid codes
Getting Started
Validity Checks Demo
Get Basic Information
Generate summaries and statistics on key fields – Record count – Totals and key subtotals – Average, maximum, minimum values
Run “overview” reports (Classify, Summarize)
Get Basic Information
Summary statistics demo
Overview reports demo
Look for Anomalies
Exception reports Statistical deviance and digital analysis – Benford’s Law – Rounding of amounts – Even dollar amounts Stuff to Read: www.utexas.edu//audit/files/ Using Audit Tools Case Studies Digital Analysis
Look for Anomalies
Look for Anomalies
Look for Anomalies Exception report demo
Benford’s analysis demo
Detailed Transaction Analysis Extract “suspect” records for review Select statistically valid sample for review and extract
Detailed Transaction Analysis Extract Demo
ACL Exercises Go to
www.utexas.edu//audit/files/ all files. Open CARDUSE.ACL using ACL Workbook and follow instructions in EXERCISES.DOC.
Example Procurement Card Fraud Background Fiscal Year 2000 Audit Plan – Spot Check Procurement Card Program Fiscal Year 99 Follow up to 1997 audit Statistics – Over 300 departments and 1,680 cards – 281,000 transactions (through 5/31/2002) (78,463 in FY01, 63,559 in FY02 through 5/31)
– $41.3M ($12.0M in FY01, $9.3M in FY02 through 5/31)
Obtaining Data for Analysis Data from Bank of America Card Data Transaction Data
Merged Transaction Data File in ACL
Merchant Classes
Data from UT ing System ing/Payment Data
Data Analysis Using ACL Summaries & Statistics
High volume cardholders High dollar cardholders High volume merchants High dollar merchants
Exceptions & Anomalies Policy violations Other unusual transactions
Policy Violations Type of Purchase Created reports based on merchant class code to identify unusual types of purchases International items Gas Gifts Equipment Rental Postal Service Internet Transportation
Clothing stores Flowers
Pets Bicycle shop
Charities Schools Colleges Travel-related Utilities (including telephone services) Grocery stores Antiques
Other Policy Violations and Unusual Transactions Transactions over $999.00 limit Split Orders – multiple transactions to single
vendor on single day with total amount over $999.00
Even dollar amounts Sales tax paid to Texas merchants
Match Suspect Transactions to ing Records Complicated postings and transfers between s Matched dollar amounts and dates using ACL’s Duplicate function to identify movement of funds between s Scrutinized electronic routing and approval of electronic payment documents to identify weaknesses in segregation of duties and/or insufficient /transaction reviews
Initial Investigation
Reviewed Existing Reports
Ran Additional Reports - Single Card Use
Collection of Receipts
Meeting with Principal Investigators
Personnel Actions Secure Electronic Hardware/ Files/ etc. Coordination with Police and District Attorney’s Office Arrest of subject
Compilation of Evidence
Problems Card Use (10/97 - 4/00) • Transactions: 1,840 • Volume: $209,403
Post 4/99 Receipts Destroyed (65%) Complicated Postings Number/Type of Vendors
Compilation of Evidence
Approach Document Each Transaction Evaluate Source Documents: • Original receipt
• Receipt copy - On request or by subpoena • Vendor web sites - order history & info • E-mail purchase & shipping confirmations
Compilation of Evidence
Case I
Case II
Receipts
Receipt with forgery
Online order history
Online order history
Email confirmations
Email confirmations
Returns for credit on personal cards
Case I - Receipts
Case I - Receipts
Case I – Online Order History
Case I – Email Confirmation
Case I – Returns Return
Order
Credit
Case II – Receipt With Forgery
Forged Receipt
Case II – Receipt With Forgery
Actual Receipt
Forged Receipt
Control Issues
Separation of Duties
Sharing of s
Reconciliations
Minimal Reviews
Corrective Steps
Letters to Deans, Directors, Principal Investigators, etc. Follow-up Confirmations to Hierarchical Groups Improvement of Control Structure On-going Part of Compliance Program
Improvement of Control Structure
Website Information http://www.utexas.edu//purchasing/procard/pcardwelcome.html
Testing of new cardholders http://www.utexas.edu//purchasing/procard/pcardmodule1.html
Tightened card use limits Review/acknowledge voucher approval
On-going Compliance Activities Inclusion in Compliance Verification System Approvals of monthly vouchers Quarterly reviews using ACL
Quarterly ACL Reviews
Card Use Reports – Ranks by $ amount – Ranks by # transactions
Card Use Summary
Quarterly ACL Reviews
Card Use Reports – Ranks by $ amount – Ranks by # transactions
Compliance/Miscellaneous Reports – Transactions > $999.00 – Potential Split Orders – Posting delays > 30 days
Compliance/Misc. Summary
Compliance/Misc. Summary
Quarterly ACL Reviews
Card Use Reports – Ranks by $ amount – Ranks by # transactions
Compliance/Miscellaneous Reports – Transactions > $999.00 – Potential Split Orders – Posting delays > 30 days
College/Department Level Reports
Quarterly ACL Reviews
Merchant Summary Reports – High $ Merchants – “Suspect” Merchants – Merchant Types
Specific Card Investigations/Watches
Procard Review Procedures Reports Coordination with Other Departments
– Internal Audits – Purchasing – s Payable
Follow-up
Lon Heuer
[email protected]
Questions?
Dyan Hudson
[email protected]