Chapter – 3: Employee Attitude and Their Behavior Definition of employee attitudes Attitude is the persistent tendency, to feel and behave in a favorable or unfavorable way towards some object, person, or ideas. Attitudes are the feelings and beliefs that determine how employees will perceive the environment and ultimately behave. Attitude is a mental and neural state of readiness organized through-experience, exerting a directive or dynamic influence upon the individual’s response to all objects and situations with which it is related. It forms a mental set that affects how we view and judge our surroundings at work. The attitudes are two types:
Positive attitudes or favorable: it results employee satisfaction, high productivity, etc. Negative or unfavorable: it results strike, work slowdown, absence, and employee turnover, etc.
Features of attitude There are some features of employee attitude. These are as follows: Attitudes affect behavior of an individual by putting him ready to respond favorably or unfavorably to things in his environment. Attitudes are acquired through learning over the period of time. The process of learning attitudes starts right from childhood and continues throughout the life of a person. Attitudes are invisible as they constitute a psychological phenomenon which cannot be observed directly. They can be observed by observing the behavior of an individual. Attitudes are pervasive and every individual has some kind of attitudes towards the objects in the environment, in fact, attitudes are forced in the socialization process and may relate to anything in the environment.
Component of employee attitudes Three components of employee attitudes are:
Job satisfaction Job involvement Organizational commitment.
Job satisfaction: Job satisfaction is a set of favorable and unfavorable feelings and emotions with which employee view their work. It is a feeling of like or dislike toward something. It has some nature and characteristics. They are: It gives focus to the attitude of a single employee. It can be applied to various parts of an individual’s job. Its stability is dynamic. It can be decline even more quickly than it develops. Job satisfaction is one part of life satisfaction. That’s why it is influenced by the family life and other environment issues. Job involvement: Job involvement is the degree to which employees engage themselves in their job, invest time and energy in to them and view work as a central part of them overall lives.
Job
Politics
Family Life
Religion
Leisure
Figure: some related elements of life satisfaction Organizational Commitment: Organizational Commitment is the degree to which an employee identifies with the organization, and wants to continue activity participating in it.
Effect of employee attitudes High satisfaction always leads to high employee performance. This assumption is not always correct. Satisfied workers may have high, average, or even low level of performance. The satisfaction-performance relationship is more complex than the simple path of “satisfaction leads to performance”. Actually performance leads to satisfaction. The following figure will clarify the argument: Performance
Greater or lesser effort
Rewards Economic Sociological Psychological
Turnover Absenteeism Tardiness Theft
Perception Fair Unfair
Satisfaction or dissatisfaction
Greater or lesser commitment
Fig: The performance satisfaction-effort loop.
Factors in attitude formation The attitudes are learned. Thus for attitude formation, all those factors must be taken into from which people learn. Such factors may be analyzed in of groups. There are two types of factors like group factors and personality factors. These are explained below.
Group factors: the influence of groups on the attitudes of individuals is inversely proportional to the distance of the group from the individual. From this point of view, three types of groups have different types of effect on the attitudes of a person. 1. Family: the term family may be uses in variety of ways; it may include a nuclear family which means the immediate group of father, mother, and children; an extended family includes nuclear family and other relatives. Both these types of family have influence on the attitudes of individuals. In fact, when a person starts learning anything about the world, he learns it through his mother which is known as the process of socialization. Family has two important roles. First, other family have certain personality characteristics, evaluative criteria, and attitudes, and the family as a whole has certain attitudes and values which are shared by all other persons. Second, family mediates the influence of large social systems on the individual’s attitudes, values, and personality characteristics. 2. Reference groups: the awareness and learning of behavior alternatives is accomplished efficiently through the influence of reference groups. A reference group is any interacting aggregation of people that influences an individual’s attitudes or behavior. This group may include family or other types of groupings, either primarily or secondary groups. Reference groups serve important inputs to an individual’s learning of his attitudes and awareness of alternative behaviors and life style. 3. Social factors: the social classes have important influence on individuals’ attitudes. They have the important task of transmitting cultural behavior patterns to specific groups and families. They define the expectations of society for groups of people and for families within the groups. The family then transmits this cultural expectation to the individual. Personality factors: personality factors are important in attitude formation. However, many personality characteristics themselves are determined by group and social factors. Personality differences between individuals are very important concomitant of the discussion of attitudes. There was a coherent pattern of ethnocentric attitudes including anti-Semitism among persons having authoritarian personality. There is a relationship between personality correlates of conservatism and liberalism.
Relation between job satisfaction to turn over and absenteeism
Job satisfaction
High
Low Low
Turnover and absences
High
Fig: Relation between job satisfaction to turn over and absenteeism
Job satisfaction survey A Job satisfaction survey is a procedure by which employees report their feelings toward their jobs and works environments. Individual responses are then collected, combined and analyzed to identify the level of job satisfaction of respondents.
Benefits of job satisfaction Survey
Job satisfaction survey gives management and indication of general level of satisfaction in a company. It indicates the specific areas of satisfaction or dissatisfaction. The survey is a powerful diagnostic instrument for assessing measure employee problems. It includes the flow of communication among different groups of employee in organization Training needs can be identified to the help of job satisfaction survey. Survey can help managers to plan and monitor new programs.
Ideal survey preconditions
Top management activity the survey Employees are fully involved in planning the survey. A clean objective exists for conducting the survey. The study is designed and istrated in a manner consistent with standards for sound research. Management is capable of taking, and willing to take, follow-up action. Both the results and action plans are communicated to employees.
Hofstede’s Framework for assessing cultures One of the most widely referenced approaches for analyzing variations among culture has been done by Geert Hofstede. He surveyed more than 116,000 IBM employees in 40countries about their work-related values. He found that managers and employees vary on five dimensions of national culture. They are listed and defined as follows: 1. Power distance A national culture attribute describing the extent to which a society accepts that power in institutions and organizations is distributed inequality. This dimension deals with the desirability or undesirability of inequality and of dependence versus interdependence. It shows how the culture adapts to inequalities among its . Where power distances are low, o o o o o
People put a high value on independence Managers consult with subordinate before making decisions. There is a fairly strong work Organization culture tend to be flat Managers directly supervise more subordinates
For example US, Canada, Denmark, Great Britain. Where distances are high, o o o o o
Authority is obeyed without question Managers make automatic and paternalistic decision Business structures are featured by close control operations Organization cultures tend to be full Managers have few subordinates to report.
For example: Asian countries like Malaysia, Philippine, Panama and also in Latin America like Mexico. Implication is that coercive and referent powers are stressed over reward expert and legitimate powers. “Children treat parents with respect in the people’s republic of China- rock-the west’s music of youthful rebellion does not exactly fit in with Chinese culture because conflict between the generations is almost nonexistence” 2. Uncertainty avoidance This dimension measures how far cultures socialize their into accepting ambiguous situations and toleration uncertainty about the future. of high uncertainty avoidance cultures appear anxiety prone and devote more energy to ‘beating the future’. Uncertainty avoidance is the extent to which people feel threatened ambiguous situations and created institutions of beliefs for removing or avoiding risks and uncertainties High uncertainty avoidance: it tries to reduce risk and to develop system and method for dealing with ambiguity. o Tend to formalize organizational activities. o Depend heavily on rules and regulations for security. o Decisions are result of group consensus. Low uncertainty avoidance: o Less structuring of activities and encourage managers to take more risk o Depend heavily on their own initiative of ingenuity in getting things done. o Less formal in organization’s activity For example: US, Canada, Great Britain, Singapore, and Sweden 3. Individualism vs. collectivism Individualism: the tendency of people to look after themselves and their immediate family only. Economically advances countries: USA, Britain, Canada, High individualism 1. People are self sufficient. 2. Strong emphasis on individual initiative and achievement. 3. Autonomy and individual financial security are given high value
Collectivism: the tendency of people to belong to groups that look after each other in exchange for loyalty. For example; Pakistan, Indonesia, Ecuador. 1. A great deal of importance on group decision making and affiliation. 2. No one wants to be a single and for special attention even for a job well done. 3. Success is collective and individual praise is embarrassing because it implies that are group number is better than others. 4. Emphases belongingness and draw strength from group affiliation.
4. Quantity of life versus quality of life:
Quantity of life is the degree to which values such as assertiveness, the acquisition of money and material goods, and competition prevail. Quality of life is the degree to which people value relationships, and show sensitivity and concern for the welfare of others. 5. Long term versus short term orientation: People in cultures with long-term orientations look to the future and value thrift and persistence. A short-term orientation values the past and present and emphasizes respect for traditional and fulfilling social obligations. Job satisfaction: Job satisfaction is a set of favorable and unfavorable feelings and emotions with which employee view their work. It is a feeling of like or dislike toward something. The effect of job satisfaction on employee performance: managers interest in job satisfaction tends to center on its effect on employee performance. Researchers have recognized this interest, so we find a large number of studies that have been designed to assess the impact of job satisfaction on employee productivity, absenteeism, and turnover. Let’s look at the current state of our knowledge: Satisfaction and productivity: Workers productivity is higher in organizations with more satisfied workers. We might not be able to say that a happy worker is more productive, it is rather true that happy organizations are more productive. Satisfaction and Absenteeism: There are consistent negative relationship between satisfaction and absenteeism. Satisfied employees have fewer avoidable absences.. Satisfactions and turnover: Satisfaction is also negatively related to turnover, but the correlation is stronger than what we found for absenteeism. Satisfied employees are less likely to quit. Organizations take actions to retain high performers and weed out lower performers. How employee can express dissatisfaction: Employee dissatisfaction can be expressed in a number of ways. For example, rather than quit, employees can complain, be insubordinate, steal organizational property. Or shirk a part of their work responsible. They are defined as follows: Exit: behavior directed toward leaving the organization, including looking for a new position as well as reg. Voice: actively and constructively attempting to improve conditions, including suggesting improvements, discussing problems with superiors, and some forms of union activity. Loyalty: ively but optimistically waiting for conditions to improve, including speaking up for the organization in the face of external criticism and trusting the organization and its management to “do the right thing”
Neglect: ively allowing conditions to worsen, including chronic absenteeism or lateness, reduced effort, and increased error rate. Job satisfaction and customer satisfaction: The evidence indicates that satisfied employees increase customer satisfaction and loyalty. In service organizations, customer retention and defection are highly dependent on how front-line employees deal with customer. Satisfied employees are more likely to be friendly, upbeat, and responsive–which customers are more likely to encounter familiar faces and receive experienced service.
Dissatisfied customers can increase an employee’s job dissatisfaction. Employees who have regular with customers report that rude, thoughtless, or unreasonable demanding customers adversely affect the employees’ job satisfaction.