Macbeth Student Guide 5s6r1o

Macbeth At about 2100 lines, Macbeth is Shakespeare’s shortest tragedy and among the briefest of his plays. Scholars generally agree that the drama was written around 1606 because various references in the play correspond to events that occurred in that year. Many also believe that it was composed for a performance before King James I, who had a deep interest in witchcraft. Quite possibly the play was one of the court entertainments offered to King Christian IV of Denmark during his visit to London in 1606. In addition, researchers suggest that Shakespeare may have written Macbeth to glorify King James’s ancestry by associating him, through the historical Banquo, to the first Scottish king, Kenneth MacAlpin. The principal historical source for Macbeth is Raphael Holinshed’s Chronicles of England, Scotlande, and lrelande (1577). However, Shakespeare took great liberties with this source, adapting various historical events to increase the dramatic effect of his tragedy.

1606

Four hundred years later, students and actors continue to explore and embrace Macbeth for its intriguing portrayal of madness, ambition, and the supernatural. The play has remarkable depth, as it also encourages discussion about gender roles, human motivation, and what makes a good king. For students new to Shakespeare, Macbeth is fairly engrossing, and it is easy to determine early who the protagonists and antagonists are, and what their primary motivations are. Shakespeare displays a sensitive understanding of the human condition by dramatizing not only the way in

4 3 5

M a c b e t h

which evil enters Macbeth’s world, but also the devastating effect it has on those who yield to temptation and sin. Shakespeare concludes the tragedy on a hopeful note, however, for as awesome and corruptive as the evil is that pervades Macbeth, it is only temporary. Ultimately, time and order are restored through the actions of the defenders of goodness.

PLOT SUMMARY Act 1 Macbeth begins in an indistinct ‘‘open place,’’ where three witches are speaking in chants and planning to meet again to speak to Macbeth. The eerie scene is brief, and the witches depart. Scotland is at war, and in the next scene, Scotland’s King Duncan receives news from the battlefield. Duncan has had Scottish rebels to fight, along with an army of Norwegians. Duncan learns that Macdonwald, a traitor, and his army have been defeated, thanks in part to the violent heroics of Banquo and Macbeth. In fact, Macbeth himself killed Macdonwald. Duncan also learns that the Thane of Cawdor, another traitor, has been captured and the Norwegian army has been driven back. Duncan sentences the traitor to death and names Macbeth as the new Thane of Cawdor. In the third scene, Macbeth and Banquo are journeying to the king’s castle when they are surprised by the appearance of three witches. The hags predict that Macbeth, who holds the title of Thane of Glamis, will also become Thane of Cawdor and then King of Scotland. They also predict that, although Banquo will never rule, his descendants will be monarchs. After the witches vanish, Ross and Angus (Scottish noblemen) appear with word from King Duncan. Macbeth learns that Duncan has condemned the Thane of Cawdor for treason and that the king will bestow the title on Macbeth. Macbeth and Banquo arrive at Duncan’s castle, where the king thanks them for their valor. Duncan also announces that his son, Malcolm, will be heir to the throne. Privately, Macbeth notes that Malcolm now stands between him and the fulfillment of his prophecy to become king. Because Duncan is going to have dinner at Macbeth’s castle (Inverness), Macbeth leaves to talk to Lady Macbeth. Having read a letter from her husband about the prophecies, Lady

4 3 6

S h a k e s p e a r e

F o r

Macbeth receives the news of Duncan’s arrival with a sense of opportunity. She determines that Macbeth will seize this chance to kill the king, thus moving him closer to the throne. Seeing her husband as weak, she pushes him to do it. When the king arrives, Lady Macbeth is the picture of hospitality. Meanwhile, Macbeth has talked himself out of murdering the king, realizing that there is no unselfish reason to do so. After all, Duncan is not an evil man or a bad king. Killing him would be purely an act of ambition. Lady Macbeth chides Macbeth and shares her plan with him on how to carry out the murder. Impressed by her guile, Macbeth agrees to go through with it that very night.

Act 2 Banquo and his son, Fleance, are staying at Inverness. Banquo is having difficulty sleeping and is surprised to find Macbeth also awake. Banquo tells Macbeth that his sleep has been restless, and that he has been thinking about the witches’ prophecies. Banquo is anxious to talk to Macbeth about the matter, but they decide to discuss it later. Alone again, Macbeth sees a floating dagger that does not seem to be real. It seems to be pointing the way to Duncan, with the handle pointing toward Macbeth. Despite the eerie talk of the witches and the hallucination, Macbeth shores up his courage to murder Duncan. Once Lady Macbeth indicates that the attendants are asleep (she has made them drunk with wine), Macbeth proceeds to Duncan’s room. Waiting for her husband, Lady Macbeth reflects on what is happening. She amazes even herself, and says that she would have killed Duncan herself if he had not reminded her of her father. Macbeth enters, covered in Duncan’s blood. He becomes so unnerved by the deed, however, that he forgets to leave the daggers in Duncan’s chamber, and Lady Macbeth must finish the task. She returns to the murder scene, smears the attendants with blood and places their knives with them to make it appear that they are guilty. Just then, there is a knock at the door of the castle. The porter is hung over and has fun pretending he is the porter to hell, as he wonders which sinners he will let through the door. The visitors are Lennox and Macduff, who are supposed to meet Duncan early. When Macbeth takes him to Duncan, Macduff makes the grisly discovery. In the ensuing chaos, Duncan’s sons,

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

Peter Lindford as Macbeth, Gerald Logan as Banquo and the witches in Act I, scene iii, at the Ludlow Festival, 2001 (! Donald Cooper/Photostage. Reproduced by permission)

Malcolm and Donalbain, arrive. They are given the news of their father, followed by Macbeth’s announcement that he has killed the apparent killers, the attendants. He explains that Duncan’s death caused him to lose his temper, so he flew into a rage and killed the murderous attendants. Lady Macbeth faints, and the others attend to her. Malcolm and Donalbain do not feel safe, and decide it is best if they escape to Ireland and England. Scene 4 takes place outside Inverness where Ross and another man discuss the strange things that have been happening lately. Macduff comes out and tells them that since Malcolm and Donalbain both fled, Macbeth has been crowned King of Scotland. Macduff adds that although the attendants appear to be the guilty parties, there is suspicion that someone may have paid them to kill Duncan. Because Malcolm and Donalbain left so quickly, many think they are involved.

Act 3 Although Macbeth has fulfilled the witches’ prophecy that he will become king, he still feels


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

threatened by the prediction that Banquo’s heirs will one day rule Scotland. Banquo sees that the two prophecies given to Macbeth have come true, so he also wonders about the one concerning his lineage. Macbeth enters in king’s robes and invites Banquo to a feast. Macbeth delivers a soliloquy in which he confesses that he fears his friend Banquo. Based on the prophecies, Macbeth’s reign would lead nowhere. Now that he is king, he fears that he will be targeted by Banquo’s family. A servant returns with two men Macbeth has enlisted to kill Banquo. He provokes their sense of manliness by asking if they have what it takes to carry out the murder. When they assure him that they can do it, he adds that they must also kill Banquo’s son, Fleance. Before the feast, Macbeth meets with Lady Macbeth, and they briefly discuss the anxiety about their actions. Although Lady Macbeth intends to calm her husband, she is plagued by many of the same feelings. When Macbeth tells her he has arranged for the murders of Banquo and Fleance, she is surprised.

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 3 7

M a c b e t h

The two murderers, ed by a third man, succeed in killing Banquo as he returns to his castle for the feast, but Fleance escapes. At the banquet, Macbeth expresses his regret at the absence of his friend; but as he approaches his seat at the table, he is horrified to find Banquo’s ghost sitting in his chair. Macbeth’s fearful cries startle the other guests, who cannot see the spirit. Lady Macbeth tries to explain away his behavior to the guests by telling them that he has had such visions before, and there is no need for alarm. Once the ghost vanishes, Macbeth recovers until the ghost reappears. Macbeth becomes hysterical, and Lady Macbeth sends the guests away. Once Macbeth calms down, he decides to seek out the witches to receive their assurance about his future as King of Scotland. The paranoia that dominates his thought patterns leads him to believe he will find the comfort he desperately needs by learning more about the prophecies. The witches meet with Hecate, the goddess of witchcraft. She is irate that the witches have involved themselves in Macbeth’s life, and tells them that when he comes to talk to them, they are to conjure up apparitions and visions to confuse him further. Elsewhere, Lennox and another lord discuss Banquo’s murder and reveal that, although they suspect the tyrannous Macbeth, others blame Fleance because he fled. Macduff has gone to Malcolm in England, where they will ask for help from King Edward in overthrowing Macbeth. Having caught wind of these schemes, Macbeth is preparing for a war that many hope he loses.

Act 4 The witches meet with Macbeth and conjure up three apparitions. The first is a severed head that warns him to beware Macduff; the next is a bloody child that assures him that no man born of woman can harm him; and last is a crowned child telling him that he will not be conquered until Birnam Wood comes to his castle at Dunsinane. Macbeth is disturbed, however, when he asks about the prophecy concerning Banquo and is shown an apparition of a succession of eight kings led by Banquo’s ghost—an indication that Banquo’s heirs will indeed rule Scotland. Later, when Macbeth learns that Macduff has fled Scotland to forces with Malcolm, he sends assassins to murder Lady Macduff and her children. Meanwhile in England, Malcolm tests Macduff’s loyalty by pretending to be a lascivious and immoral man

4 3 8


F o r

incapable of ruling a kingdom. When Macduff expresses his indignation at Malcolm’s supposed exploits, the prince is satisfied that Macduff is truly loyal to Scotland. Fully trusting Macduff, Malcolm invites him to his army. While talking with Malcolm, Macduff receives word that Macbeth has slaughtered his family and he vows to avenge their deaths.

Act 5 Driven insane by fear and guilt over Duncan’s murder, Lady Macbeth walks in her sleep and tries to rub out imaginary bloodstains on her hands. Outside, several lords talk about the approaching English army led by Malcolm. A Scottish army will meet them at Birnam Wood to their effort to bring down Macbeth. Meanwhile, Macbeth confidently clings to the witches’ assurances that he is invulnerable as he prepares to engage Malcolm’s army at Dunsinane castle. He receives word that the army is approaching the castle, and he prepares to don his battle armor. When a doctor tells him that Lady Macbeth is suffering greatly from delusions, Macbeth merely tells the doctor to cure her. He experiences increasing fear and nervousness as a result of his past actions, but when he learns that his wife has committed suicide, his reaction is imive. Macbeth is initially disconcerted when he hears reports that his enemies approach Dunsinane camouflaged by tree branches from Birnam Wood, but reassures himself that no man born of woman can harm him. He feels invincible as he places all of his trust in the apparent message from the witches. Still, he cannot help but recall the strange prophecy about the woods, and he begins to resign himself to what may be his doom. Outside, Malcolm commands his troops to drop their boughs and prepare to fight. Macbeth fights vigorously, certain that no one can kill him. Macduff seeks Macbeth out personally, as Malcolm enters the castle. When Macbeth encounters Macduff on the battlefield, he learns that his opponent was ‘‘untimely ripp’d’’ from his mother’s womb (meaning he was born by Caesarean section). Realizing that his fate is sealed, Macbeth nevertheless battles on until he is killed by Macduff. Upon defeating his enemy, Macduff triumphantly holds Macbeth’s severed head aloft to Malcolm, who is proclaimed King of Scotland.

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

MEDIA ADAPTATIONS Macbeth has been adapted for numerous film productions all over the world. A 1948 film featuring Orson Welles (who also directed), Jeanette Nolan, Dan O’Herlihy, and Roddy McDowell, was released by Republic and was distributed by Republic Pictures Home Video. ! In 1971, Roman Polanski wrote a controversial adaptation, which featured realistic design, graphic violence, and a fatalistic atmosphere. It was produced by Andrew Draunsberg and Hugh Hefner, and was distributed by RCA/Columbia Pictures Home Video. !

The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and Miami Dade Community College produced a 1978 film adaptation narrated by Jose´ Ferrer and distributed by Films, Inc. ! Numerous television adaptations of Macbeth have also been produced worldwide. The BBC and Time Life Television produced a television adaptation in 1976; it was distributed by TimeLife Video. ! In 1979, Trevor Nunn wrote a television adaptation that starred Ian McKellan and Judi Dench; it was produced by the Royal Shakespeare Company and Thames Television. !

!

In addition, audio adaptations include releases by Caedmon (1995); Cambridge University Press (unabridged, 1998); Canadian Broadcasting Company (2003); and Audio Partners (unabridged, 2005).

CHARACTERS Banquo Banquo is a nobleman and a general in Duncan’s army. With Macbeth, he encounters the witches, and from their prophecies, he learns that his descendants will be kings. Although Banquo savors the thought of his heirs becoming kings,


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

he never considers speeding the process along with evil-doing as Macbeth does; he remains loyal to King Duncan. Banquo believes Macbeth is still his friend, despite knowing what the prophecies say. This trust leaves him vulnerable. Macbeth arranges the murder of Banquo, and his son Fleance, to thwart the witches’ prediction. Banquo’s ghost later haunts Macbeth at a banquet. While much of the action of Macbeth revolves around the protagonist and his wife, Banquo is also an important figure. One critical perspective views Banquo’s function as essentially symbolic: he is portrayed as a man who, like Macbeth, has the capacity for both God’s grace and sin; but unlike Macbeth, he puts little stock in the Weird Sisters’ prophecies and does not succumb to their temptations. Banquo’s reluctance to dwell on the witches’ predictions therefore underscores, by contrast, the nature of Macbeth’s descent into evil. Another critical viewpoint, however, suggests that Banquo is just as guilty as Macbeth of succumbing to the witches’ temptations. By complying with Macbeth’s accession to the throne and not raising suspicions about his role in Duncan’s murder, Banquo reveals a secret hope that the Weird Sisters’ prophecy for him will also come true.

Donalbain Donalbain is Duncan’s son and Malcolm’s brother. After the king’s murder, he flees to Ireland in fear of his life, while his brother flees to England.

Duncan Duncan is the King of Scotland when the play begins. He is depicted as a good and just king with a sense of honor toward his men and his subjects. He seems to be a man of wisdom, grace, and order. But he is perhaps too trusting, as he allows himself to be vulnerable in Macbeth’s home, even though he just endowed Macbeth with the promoted position of thane. Having just been betrayed by the Thane of Cawdor, one might expect him to be more cautious in his assessments of those near him, but he is not. While a guest at Macbeth’s castle, Duncan is murdered by his host. Shakespeare contrasts Duncan and Macbeth. Through his benevolence, graciousness, and almost naive trust, Duncan embodies a sense of harmony which generally inspires loyalty among his followers. These attributes become inverted in Macbeth,

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 3 9

M a c b e t h

who introduces tumult and disorder into the kingdom when he murders the king and assumes his place on the throne. The sense of order inherent in Duncan’s reign is thus displaced. His assassination sets into motion a series of evil actions and unnatural disturbances that are not corrected until Malcolm and Macduff restore order at the end of the play.

Fleance Fleance is Banquo’s son. Macbeth attempts to assassinate him along with his father in order to thwart the witches’ prophecy that Banquo’s descendants will become kings. Fleance escapes, however, thus assuring the survival of the family line.

Macbeth At the beginning of the play, Macbeth is the Thane of Glamis and a general in Duncan’s army. He is fierce and heroic on the battlefield, and his valor wins him the iration and gratitude of his king. The play begins with Macbeth on the battlefield, and it ends with him on the battlefield, although the two situations are markedly different and clearly demonstrate the degree to which Macbeth has fallen. Yet for all his leadership and courage in the face of battle at the beginning of the play, Macbeth is easily manipulated by the witches and Lady Macbeth. Macbeth encounters three witches who predict that he will become King of Scotland; these prophecies begin the process of awakening his personal ambition for power. Influenced by this ambition and Lady Macbeth’s urgings, Macbeth plots to murder Duncan and take the throne. His evil deed introduces corruption and unnatural disturbances into the kingdom. As quickly as he rose to power, he begins to unravel and descend into paranoia and madness. He is the epitome of a tyrannical king, abusing power and wielding it for his own personal agenda without regard for the kingdom. Macbeth is ultimately conquered by Malcolm and Macduff. One of the most significant reasons for the enduring critical interest in Macbeth’s character is that he represents humankind’s universal propensity to temptation and sin. Macbeth’s excessive ambition motivates him to murder Duncan, and once the evil act is accomplished, he sets into motion a series of sinister events that ultimately lead to his downfall. But Macbeth is not merely a cold-blooded, calculating murderer; even before he kills the king, he is greatly troubled by his

4 4 0


F o r

conscience. While plotting Duncan’s murder, his better nature warns him that the act is wrong; he nearly persuades himself to reject the plan, but his wife forces him to reaffirm his determination. The fact that Macbeth possesses a conscience seems to be established from the beginning of the play, and it is this conscience that fuels such anxiety and madness. He finds himself caught in a tug-of-war between his hubris compelling him to push past his conscience and commit violent crimes, and his conscience that punishes him for ignoring it. In addition, Macbeth possesses a powerful imagination—demonstrated by his excessive philosophizing over his condition—that sways his actions. In fact, the hero’s imagination contributes greatly to his decision to murder Duncan: after his first meeting with the Weird Sisters, Macbeth acknowledges that he can wait to see if their prediction of his imminent kingship will come true, but his imagination persuades him to fulfill the prophecy with his own hands. Later, Macbeth’s overworked imagination produces feelings of guilt and betrayal that throw his mind into disorder, gradually eroding his bravery and replacing it with inexplicable fear and paranoia. Several critics remark that although Macbeth fully embraces evil, his philosophizing over the hopelessness of his situation results in some of the greatest poetry ever written on the human condition. Others argue, however, that the hero’s rhetoric becomes less sincere as his actions become more ruthless. Macbeth is the character who reveals the most about himself throughout the play, although the audience likely never develops much sympathy for him. His psychological workings (rise of ambition, hallucinations, belief in prophecy, madness) provide the development necessary for the themes of ambition, evil, and kingship. Through his soliloquies, the audience learns the truth about Macbeth’s thoughts, feelings, and ambitions.

Lady Macbeth Lady Macbeth is Macbeth’s wife. She is cold, scheming, and ruthless. She coerces her husband into murdering Duncan, first chiding Macbeth for his reluctance. Shakespeare shows the audience from the beginning that this is a woman who knows her husband very well; she anticipates his reluctance to kill Duncan, and she plans for how she will pressure him into doing

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

it anyway. She challenges his manliness so she can manipulate him, and unfortunately, she is his only advisor throughout the play. It is she who devises the plan to kill Duncan and frame the chamberlains for the regicide, all the while keeping up her appearance as the lady of the castle. After the murder, however, Lady Macbeth is driven insane with guilt and commits suicide. She is ultimately unable to handle the horror she has set into motion. While initially she seemed to know herself, by the end of the play it is clear that she had an exaggerated perception of how much evil her psyche could handle. Her descent into madness ends where it began—with killing. Although it is not explicit, the play strongly suggests that she commits suicide. She wanted nothing more than to be queen, yet the means by which she attained it would not allow her to have any peace or enjoyment of it. Most critics contend that Lady Macbeth’s principal dramatic function in Macbeth is to persuade her husband to commit evil. Some critics further suggest that Lady Macbeth embodies a feminine malevolence in the play that corresponds to a masculine fear of domination by women. This antagonism is particularly evident in the unusual level of control Lady Macbeth exerts over her husband. Further, she serves much the same role as the witches do in manipulating Macbeth to murder Duncan, but her influence is of a more frightening nature. As supernatural beings, the witches represent a remote, abstract evil, and their mode of exploitation exists only on a cosmic level. Lady Macbeth’s coercion of her husband is more terrifying because she brings the full magnitude of the witches’ evil influence to the domestic level by calling on demonic forces to suppress her femininity and give her the power to make Macbeth murder Duncan. This unholy contract does not endure, for, after she actively participates in covering up Duncan’s murder, Lady Macbeth’s feminine nature reasserts itself, and she is driven insane. Many commentators assert that Lady Macbeth’s mental breakdown manifests itself in the sleepwalking episode (act 5, scene 1), in which she is not so much distracted by the guilt over her role in Duncan’s murder as she is by the inability to escape the memory of it.

Macduff Macduff is the Thane of Fife, and one of Duncan’s generals. He is depicted as honorable,


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

loyal, and level-headed, even in crisis. Macduff is the one who discovers Duncan’s murdered body. As he sees the destruction wrought by Macbeth and harbors suspicions toward him, Macduff becomes an avenger. He sees not just revenge or power, but peace and order for the Scotland he so loves. He flees to England to forces with Malcolm, who is seeking military assistance to bring down Macbeth. Upon learning that Macbeth has killed his family, Macduff swears revenge. When Macduff returns to Scotland with Malcolm’s invading army, he meets Macbeth on the battlefield. He kills his enemy after informing him that he was ‘‘untimely ripp’d’’ from his mother’s womb, thus fulfilling the witches’ prophesy that no man born of woman can harm Macbeth.

Lady Macduff Lady Macduff is Macduff’s wife. Macbeth sends assassins to murder Lady Macduff and her family when he learns that her husband has fled to England.

Malcolm Malcolm is Duncan’s son, Donalbain’s brother, and heir to the Scottish throne. He is a loyal, determined, brave, and careful young man. He seems to have a good idea of whom he can trust (as when he goes to King Edward for help), and he knows how to test those he is not sure he can trust (as when he tests Macduff). After his father’s murder, Malcolm flees to England in fear of his life. There, he recruits an army to invade Scotland and conquers Macbeth’s forces at Dunsinane. Malcolm ultimately regains his rightful place on Scotland’s throne. Because he was originally the rightful heir to the throne through his father, he reinforces the theme of divine right of kingship that was so important to King James. Unlike Macbeth, who stole the throne, Malcolm has a right to the throne.

The Witches The Witches, or the Weird Sisters, are three hags who practice black magic under the authority of the goddess of witchcraft, Hecate. They speak in chants and riddles, and they are both mischievous and sinister. While they may seem nonsensical, the text proves that they are cruel and violent. They talk about what they have done prior to their meetings, and their actions include killing a hog and setting about revenge because a woman would not give one of them a chestnut.

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 4 1

M a c b e t h

The witches’ prophecies to Macbeth and Banquo suggest that Macbeth will rule Scotland and that Banquo’s descendants will be kings. These prophecies effectively set the action of the play in motion. Later, the witches conjure up three apparitions who warn Macbeth against Macduff, assure him that no man born of woman will harm him, and declare that he will not be conquered until Birnam Wood comes to Dunsinane. Readers are never quite sure how much of the prophecies delivered by the witches are merely their relaying information from the future and how much is their direct doing. Regardless, their malevolent intentions are clear in their delight in deception and destruction of Macbeth. In act 1, scene 3, the witches refer to themselves as the ‘‘weird sisters,’’ which is a significant word choice. In Shakespeare’s first folio, he spelled it ‘‘weyward,’’ and most scholars point to the origins of these words as the Old English ‘‘wyrd’’ and the Middle English ‘‘werde.’’ Both words have to do with fate, destined, or becoming. The Norse had the three Norns, goddesses of destiny, and the Greeks had the three Fates (one who spun the thread of a person’s life, one who measured it, and one who cut it.) By aligning the witches with these past mythological women, Shakespeare invokes a powerful and serious role for the witches.

THEMES

Macbeth’s ambition is within him from the beginning, but without the encouragement of the witches and Lady Macbeth, it might have been restrained. But had it not been in him at all, the women would never have been able to awaken such a cruel and violent force. This insight into Macbeth’s character forces the audience to wonder what the outcome would be if their ambitions were fully awakened. What is also interesting about Macbeth’s ambition is that there seems to be no objective beyond sitting on the throne. Macbeth does not have lofty plans of becoming a great king, expanding Scotland’s holdings, or building a thriving economy. His thoughts are only for himself, so once he ascends to the throne, his ambition turns to paranoia and madness in his resolve to keep his place on the throne. Shakespeare demonstrates that ambition does not reside only alongside evil. After all, Banquo is taken with the prophecy that his heirs will sit on the throne one day, even though he never will. Anyone would be proud to hear such a thing, and Banquo is no exception. Unlike Macbeth, however, Banquo’s ambition is perfectly content in the future of his family. He has no aspirations of his own to overthrow Macbeth, even though he sees no way that his own heirs could become royalty. Banquo is also different from Macbeth in that he wants to discuss the prophecies with the man he thinks is still his friend, Macbeth. Just as anyone would talk about important matters like this with confidants, Banquo wants to talk to his friend about it. Macbeth, however, now sees Banquo as a threat that must be eliminated.

Ambition The predominant theme in Macbeth is ambition unchecked by morality. Initially, Lady Macbeth is the character who personifies this theme. It is she who first considers killing Duncan in her own home so that Macbeth might become king, and it is she who pressures her reluctant husband into committing the crime. She has no thought for right and wrong, only a lust for power. As the play progresses, however, Macbeth becomes the one who is unyielding in his determination to protect his claim to the throne. Once he wears the crown, his ambition takes flight. He readily has his friend Banquo killed, and even tries to have Banquo’s son killed to ensure that there is no threat to him from Banquo’s family. Carried to its conclusion in Macbeth, ambition without moral boundaries is utterly destructive.

4 4 2


F o r

Kingship Macbeth explores the theme of kingship—good and bad, legitimate and illegitimate. In Macbeth, the audience sees what happens to a country when it falls under the reign of a self-centered, immoral, and evil king. Not only are the means to his ends evil, he rapidly descends into cruel immorality to the point that he uses monarchical means (his power and his men) to carry out purely personal revenge (the murder of Macduff’s family for no other reason than spite). Where a good king places his personal interests below the good of the kingdom, a bad king makes the kingdom subservient to his own personal whims. In a short period of time, Macbeth’s court becomes afraid for the future of the country, and hopes that Malcolm and

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

Sean Bean as Macbeth and Samantha Bond as Lady Macbeth in Act I, scene vii, at the Albery Theatre, London, 2002 (!Donald Cooper/Photostage. Reproduced by permission)

England’s army will defeat their king. Macbeth is also an example of a king who appears to have legitimate authority, but the audience knows that the only reason he has been crowned is because he got away with murdering the rightful king. So, Macbeth represents a monarchy of bad kingship and an ultimately illegitimate claim to authority. In contrast to Macbeth are the characters Duncan, Malcolm, and King Edward. Before his death, Duncan appears to have been a noble, kind, and just king. Malcolm is the rightful heir to the throne and is, by all indications, a man who will be a good king to Scotland. He is perceptive, bold, moral, shrewd, militarily gifted, and deeply loyal to Scotland. His only apparent weakness seems to be his youth, but Shakespeare proves to the audience that he is discerning enough to learn from the wisdom of older, honorable men like Macduff. When he is crowned king at the end, the play seems to have achieved a happy ending. Although less obvious, King Edward is also presented as an example of a good king. Not


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

only is he characterized as a comionate man who uses his healing powers to help his people, but he also hears Malcolm and Macduff and agrees to help them oust the unjust King Macbeth. He seems to be free of personal ambition, yet discerning enough to know to whom he can trust his army.

Evil Macbeth is a complex study of evil and its corrupting influence on individuals. Some critics argue that Shakespeare adapted historical s of Macbeth to illustrate his larger view of evil’s operation in the world. The particular evil that the protagonist commits has widespread consequences, causing a series of further evils. As a result, the tragedy is not fully resolved through the fallen hero’s death, but through the forces of good that ultimately correct all the evil Macbeth has unleashed. The witches, through their ambiguous prophecies, represent a supernatural power that introduces evil into Macbeth. Their equivocations—the intentional stating of half-truths—conceal the sinister nature of their

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 4 3

M a c b e t h

TOPICS FOR FURTHER STUDY There is an intriguing bit of theater lore surrounding Macbeth called ‘‘the curse of Macbeth.’’ Do some research on this curse to see what supposedly triggers the curse, and what supposedly happens as a result of the curse. Are there are any countermeasures for the curse? How seriously do actors and producers take this legend, and how do you think it began? Prepare a multimedia presentation explaining the origins and specifics of the curse, and how you explain it. Your presentation should be persuasive in tone. ! Both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth seem overwhelmed by their guilt. Consider these two characters from a psychological standpoint by first researching the effect of guilt and conscience on the psyche. You may read conflicting reports based on different research or theories, so you will have to determine which you think are the most reliable. Write up a report as if you were the psychotherapist for the Macbeths, and you have been assigned to assess their psychological states. Assuming they are both still alive, what course of action do you recommend for them? ! Banquo is based on a historical figure from whom James I descended. See what you can find out about the real Banquo, and write a speech for James I about him. To the best of your ability, write in language of the time. ! Macbeth is thematically rich and relevant to today’s world. What theme do you find most closely parallels something you see in the world around you? It might be a person, a cultural tendency, an event, or anything else that appears parallel to you. Using quotes from the play, prepare a five- to ten-minute speech about the relevance of Macbeth to today’s readers. Your speech should be memorized and delivered to your class or another small audience.

years. Find photos from various productions of the play and choose the ones you think are especially evocative of the play. Make copies of the pictures and put them in order as a slideshow or some other visual presentation to show scenes from the play from start to finish. You will not have a picture for every scene, which is fine. If you are able, choose music and set your presentation to a score.

!

!

4 4 4

Because of the popularity of Macbeth among actors and theater-goers, there have been many major productions over the


F o r

!

Shakespeare penned some of the great soliloquies and speeches of dramatic literature. Among them is the one in act 4, scene 5, beginning, ‘‘Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow.’’ Memorize this speech and practice delivering it in a way that conveys Macbeth’s feelings at this moment in the play. Deliver it to a beginning acting class, explaining why you made some of the choices you made regarding delivery. Does this exercise give you a greater appreciation for Shakespearean actors?

!

Malcolm goes to England to seek help from the king to overthrow Macbeth. How common a practice was this in Britain’s past? Why would one country help another country become stronger? Read about Britain’s past with special attention to military endeavors. Look for patterns or themes explaining the relations between these countries. Using maps and diagrams, put together a lesson to illuminate this issue for your class. Be sure to leave time for questions.

!

Although the audience does not have the chance to know Duncan very well before his murder, he is presented as an example of a good king. Drawing from the text of the play and your imagination, write a character sketch of Duncan as we might have known him if given the chance. Write one scene from a play that takes place in his court to show what kind of man and king he was, according to your sketch.

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

predictions, and Macbeth does not consider the possibility that they are trying to deceive him. In fact, the witches’ attempts at misinformation succeed not only because they favorably interpret the hero’s future, but also because their revelations seem to come true almost immediately. Although inherently malevolent, the witches’ prophecies do not necessarily signify the actual existence of evil, but suggest instead the potential for evil in the world. The witches themselves do not have the power to enact a diabolic course of events such as those seen in Macbeth; rather, their power lies in tempting humans like Macbeth to sin. When Macbeth succumbs to the temptation to commit murder, he himself is the catalyst that unleashes evil upon the world. The evil that initially manifests itself in Duncan’s murder not only disintegrates Macbeth’s personal world, but also expands until it corrupts all levels of creation, contaminating the family, the state, and the physical universe. For example, Macduff’s family is murdered, Scotland is embroiled in a civil war, and during Duncan’s assassination ‘‘the earth was feverous, and did shake’’ (act 2, scene 3).

Gender Roles Another important issue in Macbeth is Shakespeare’s ambiguous treatment of gender and sex roles. In many instances, the playwright either inverts a character’s conventional gender characteristics or divests the figure of them altogether. For example, Shakespeare makes the witches less human by taking away their femininity. Macbeth and Banquo find them repulsive and comment on their beards. Lady Macbeth is perhaps the most obvious example of this dispossession. In act 1, scene 5, she prepares to confront her husband by resolving to ‘‘unsex’’ herself, to suppress any supposed weakness associated with her feminine nature, so that she can give Macbeth the strength and determination to carry out Duncan’s murder. After the king is killed, however, her feelings of guilt gradually erode her resolve and she goes insane. Macbeth is perhaps the character most affected by the question of gender in the tragedy. From the beginning of the play, he is plagued by feelings of doubt and insecurity which his wife attributes to ‘‘effeminate’’ weakness. Fearing that her husband does not have the resolve to murder Duncan, Lady Macbeth cruelly manipulates his lack of self-confidence by questioning his manhood. Some critics maintain that as a


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

result of his wife’s machinations, Macbeth develops a warped perspective of manliness, equating it with the less humanistic attribute of self-seeking aggression. When he talks to Banquo’s hired assassins, he incites their anger by challenging their manliness, just as his wife had done to him. The more Macbeth pursues his ideal understanding of manliness—first by murdering Duncan, then Banquo, and finally Macduff’s family—the less humane he becomes. Commentators who subscribe to this reading of Macbeth’s character argue that the ruthlessness with which he strives to obtain this perverted version of manhood ultimately separates him from the rest of humankind. Through his diminishing humanity, Macbeth essentially forfeits all claims on humanity itself—a degeneration, he ultimately realizes, that renders meaningless his ideal of manliness.

STYLE Symbolism Shakespeare infuses Macbeth with symbolism, giving the play a greater sense of drama and foreboding. The weather in the play symbolizes Macbeth’s—and, later, Scotland’s—condition. Upon the play’s opening, with the witches’ first appearance, and also on the night Macbeth kills Duncan, there are thunderstorms, symbolizing the violence and chaos being stirred up in Scotland. When Duncan is killed, there is even an earthquake, symbolizing Scotland’s throes of grief for its king. Blood is used to symbolize two elements: the ascension to the throne, and also the guilt from which the Macbeths can never escape. Duncan’s blood on Macbeth and Macbeth’s blood on Macduff represent changes in the monarchy; this is a fitting symbol, as kingship is usually based on bloodlines. But the blood Macbeth must clean from his hands, and that which Lady Macbeth seems never able to clean from hers, symbolizes the guilt of their heinous acts. Blood is a stain on their conscience that cannot be removed.

Oxymoron The witches speak extensively in oxymoron. From the very beginning, in the first scene of the play, the audience hears them say, ‘‘When the battle’s lost and won,’’ and ‘‘Fair is foul, and foul is fair.’’ In act 1 scene 3, they say such inscrutable and contradictory things as, ‘‘Lesser

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 4 5

M a c b e t h

than Macbeth, and greater,’’ ‘‘Not so happy, yet much happier,’’ and ‘‘Thou shalt get kings, though thou be none.’’ The things the witches say, coupled with their incantation-like delivery, create an atmosphere of mystery and eeriness. They seem to speak truth, but they do it in riddles. This makes Macbeth and Banquo believe that what they are saying is extremely important and fateful. Macbeth never seems to consider that at least some of the prophetic statements made were self-fulfilling, and so the witches and their oxymoron become the very voice of fate. The witches are not the only ones to speak in contradictions. The first words out of Macbeth’s mouth in the play are, ‘‘So foul and fair a day I have not seen.’’ This indicates a divided nature and a sense of disorder about him that acts simultaneously as oxymoron and foreshadowing.

Depiction of Time Shakespeare’s depiction of time is another central concern in Macbeth. Macbeth dislocates the age of time—a process fundamental to humankind’s existence—when he succumbs to evil and murders Duncan. Shakespeare uses this displacement as a key symbol in dramatizing the steady disintegration of the hero’s world. Macbeth’s evil actions initially interrupt the normal flow of time, but order gradually regains its proper shape and overpowers the new king, as demonstrated by his increasing guilt and sleeplessness. Ironically, the witches can be seen as an element that contributes to the restoration of order. Although Macbeth disrupts the natural course of events by acting on the witches’ early prophecies, their later predictions suggest that his power will shortly end. This premonition is apparent in the Birnam wood revelation; while Macbeth believes that the prediction insures his invulnerability, it really implies that his rule will soon expire. Some critics observe that different kinds of time interact in Macbeth. The most apparent form of time can be described as chronological. Chronological time establishes the sense of physical age in the play, focusing on the succession of events that can be measured by clock and calendar, as well as the movement of the sun, moon, and stars. Another aspect of time, identified as providential, overarches the action of the entire play. Providential time is the divine ordering of events that is initially displaced by Macbeth’s evil

4 4 6


F o r

actions, but which gradually overpowers him and re-establishes harmony in the world. Macbeth conceives of another kind of time that seems to defy cause and effect when he unsuccessfully attempts to reconcile his anticipation of the future with the memory of his ignoble actions. This dilemma initiates a period of inaction in the protagonist’s life that culminates in his resigned acceptance of death as the inexorable age of time. This confused displacement of time pervades the action of Macbeth until Malcolm and Macduff restore a proper sense of order at the end of the play.

Imagery Various image patterns the sense of corruption and deterioration that pervades the dramatic action of Macbeth. Perhaps one of the most dominant groups of images is that of babies and breast-feeding. Infants symbolize pity throughout the play, and breast-milk represents humanity, tenderness, sympathy, and natural human feelings, all of which have been debased by Macbeth and Lady Macbeth’s evil actions. Another set of images focuses on sickness and medicine, all of which occur, significantly, in the last three acts of the play, after Macbeth has ascended the Scottish throne. These patterns are given greater depth through Shakespeare’s graphic depiction of blood in the tragedy. The numerous references to blood not only provide Macbeth’s ruthless actions with a visual dimension, they also underscore Scotland’s degeneration after Macbeth murders Duncan and usurps the crown. Ironically, blood also symbolizes the purifying process by which Malcolm and Macduff—the restorers of goodness—purge the weakened country of Macbeth’s villainy. Other major image patterns include sleep and sleeplessness, order versus disorder, and the contrast between light and darkness.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT Reign of King James I England’s James I (also James VI of Scotland) was born in 1566 in Edinburgh. At the end of Elizabeth’s reign in England, she had produced no heir. The ascension of her cousin James (the only son of Mary, Queen of Scots) to the throne brought much-needed dynastic stability to the throne of England. James had been careful in

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

his rule of Scotland not to do anything to jeopardize his claim to the English throne. He had an eye toward England, and Elizabeth’s chief minister, Robert Cecil, had corresponded with James for two years before Elizabeth’s death. These letters prepared James for the daunting task of ruling England. Upon first taking the throne in England, James’s insensitivity to English ways made waves with Parliament, and the English people found him a very disappointing successor to Elizabeth. Where she had been a grand people-pleaser, James was frumpy and lacking in social graces or respect for tradition. James found that Elizabeth had left a sizeable debt, but he only grew it over his first five years. Further, many people in England had high hopes that James would be able to solve the long-standing problem of unity with Scotland. But James’s move to London kept him apart from his native Scotland, and the chasm between the two nations remained. Still, James’s reign is ed as one of peace and security that brought stability to the issue of religion, although political conflicts burdened his rule. Shakespeare’s career was in full force from Elizabeth’s reign when James came to power, and James embraced the playwright as fully as his predecessor had. Not only was Shakespeare a favorite of James, but it was he who gave Shakespeare’s company the title of King’s Men. Macbeth reflects James’s kingship and court in several ways. First, James descended from the historical Banquo, so Shakespeare’s inclusion of Banquo as a sort of father of the English monarchy is a nod to James’s heritage. Second, the apparition Macbeth sees of the procession of kings includes, in the original stage directions, a king holding a mirror. This is interpreted by some scholars to be a way of including England’s current king (James, who did not allow references in plays to living monarchs) at the time in the lineup. Third, the theme of kingship was one of special interest to James, who was working out his version of the theory of the divine right of kings over their people and land. In 1598, he had written a treatise titled Trew Law of Free Monarchies. Fourth, James had a particular interest in the power of witchcraft, an interest shared by many people in his day.

Shakespeare’s English Theater A prolific writer of comedies, tragedies, and histories, Shakespeare is credited with authorship of thirty-seven plays, many of which are frequently


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

performed in today’s theater. As a playwright, Shakespeare’s achievement is considered by many to be unparalleled and his era is considered a pivotal time in Western literature. Historians frequently observe that Shakespeare’s arrival on the London theater scene was well-timed. The theater was coming into its own as a serious literary venue, and plays were diverse in subject matter. The theaters in London were also wellattended and patronized. Shakespeare’s unique ability to write about universal human experiences and truths brought depth and accessibility to his dramas as well as his comedies. By also writing histories, he reinforced the popular interest in national, classical, and monarchical history, while paying homage to the monarchs on whose he depended. Shakespeare wrote during the reigns of Elizabeth and James, and he found different preferences between the two monarchs. Jacobean drama, in particular, tended to feature the royal court and London, although King James forbade overt references to living monarchs. Where Elizabethan drama had encouraged justice-seekers, Jacobean drama was drawn to pathetic, manipulated characters. Also common in Jacobean drama were conniving women, which is certainly a prominent feature in Macbeth. Macbeth also typifies Jacobean drama in its elements of violence, terror, and darkness. Even Jacobean comedy was often satiric and biting. Although Shakespeare may have been less productive under James’s patronage, many scholars believe that his works in these years were more refined and intense.

CRITICAL OVERVIEW Not surprisingly, Macbeth has received volumes of critical commentary over the years. Not only is the play an audience favorite, but its complex characterization, deeply woven themes, and characteristic Shakespearean style make it rich ground for scholarly inquiry. Critics such as Harold Bloom have remarked on the importance of Macbeth in the context of Shakespeare’s works. In Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human, Bloom writes, ‘‘The rough magic in Macbeth is wholly Shakespeare’s; he indulges his own imagination as never before, seeking to find its moral limits (if any).’’ Bloom also remarks, ‘‘Macbeth is an uncanny unity of

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 4 7

M a c b e t h

COMPARE & CONTRAST !

1000s: Scotland has a monarchy. During the 1000s, three different dynasties ruled Scotland. 1600s: Scotland has a monarchy. During the 1600s, the House of Stuart maintains authority on the throne.

Today: Scotland has its own parliament, established in 1998. This is the first time Scotland has had an independent parliament since 1707, when the Scottish Parliament and the English Parliament united into the British Parliament under the Treaty of the Union. ! 1000s: Drama in the eleventh century is often religious, and is born out of the tradition of retelling biblical stories in Latin. But a trend toward performing plays outdoors, in native languages, and with secular subjects is growing. Acting troupes rely on trade guilds to sponsor their productions. Mystery plays became popular; in these plays, the biblical of salvation was presented. Mystery plays focused on Old Testament subjects such as the Fall or the prophets, or on New Testament subjects such as Christ’s birth, or on Christ’s death and resurrection. Together, these were known as cycle dramas. Eventually, these would become secularized to the point that the church raised serious objections. 1600s: London theater is thriving as the English language is considered a major vehicle for literary expression. By combining English interests and culture with conventions of classical drama, the English theater is full of potential. Besides portraying stories about relationships, history, and politics, the London theater has become a vital instrument in the ionate religious debates of the day. Today: Theater must compete with television and film for audience interest. Although many theaters still attract large audiences, the most popular plays tend to be well-known plays or musicals, or those by already-established playwrights. While there is room in the theater

4 4 8


F o r

world for experimental and modern drama, audiences for these types of plays tend to be niche theater-goers. !

1000s: With respect to marriage in common households, keeping up the home is the priority for families. In the early Middle Ages, only the eldest sons marry, so that the others can stay and help the family. Men perform the labor necessary to work a farm or bring in income, while the women perform domestic duties. Men are considered the leaders of the home, and they generally exercise authority over money and other major decisions. 1600s: It is common for families to arrange marriages, and they can be arranged while the bride and groom are young teenagers. The parents make these deals with one another to try to improve the social or financial standing of their families. Gender roles in marriage remain traditional, with the man working to his family and the woman overseeing domestic responsibilities. Women possess no political power (with the obvious exception of monarchs) and they are not empowered to own land. Submission to their husbands is important for the family to run smoothly and for the family to be respected in society. Today: Not just in England, but throughout the Western world, gender roles in marriage are more fluid than ever. Men and women decide whether they will both work, and if not, which will stay home. Men and women share an abundance of work opportunities, based on their education and experience rather than gender. This gives married couples a greater degree of flexibility than in the past to make decisions about how their work will factor into their marriage. At home, gender roles are no longer assigned or assumed. Either the husband or the wife may perform domestic duties, manage the family finances, or make social plans. The norm is for the couple to make major decisions together in equal partnership.

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

setting, plot, and characters, fused together beyond comparison with any other play of Shakespeare’s.’’ Bloom is not alone in his iration for this enduring play. In his article ‘‘Macbeth: The Pattern of Idea and Action’’ for Shakespeare Quarterly, Irving Ribner states, ‘‘Macbeth is a closely knit, unified construction, every element of which is designed to an intellectual statement, to which action, character, and poetry all contribute.’’ Critics continue to debate the characterization of Macbeth as a tragic hero. There is no consensus as to whether Macbeth is technically tragic or whether he is to be considered a hero. In drama, a tragedy traditionally recounts the significant events or actions in a protagonist’s life which, taken together, bring about the catastrophe. Classical rules of tragedy also require that the hero’s ruin evokes pity and fear in the audience. Some critics assert that since Macbeth’s actions throughout the play are inherently evil, he gets what he deserves in the end and therefore his downfall is not catastrophic in a tragic sense. Critic Mary McCarthy takes the position that Macbeth is actually an average man who is easily duped by superstition and the will of others. In ‘‘The Writing on the Wall and Other Literary Essays,’’ McCarthy describes Macbeth as gullible because he never question the witches’ predictions. Knowing that they are witches, he still does not consider that they may be trying to confuse and mislead him. She writes, ‘‘Macbeth is not clever; he is taken in by surfaces, by appearance. He cannot think beyond the usual course of things.’’ Although he is bold and takes initiative in battle, at home he is submissive to the will of his wife. This facet of his personality, however, compels other commentators to argue that his feelings of guilt, combined with the coercion of the witches and his wife, generate pity and fear among readers and spectators at his ruin, a feeling identified in classical tragedy as catharsis. In College English, J. Lyndon Shanley contributes an article titled, ‘‘Macbeth: The Tragedy of Evil.’’ In this essay, Shanley writes that Macbeth’s downfall is caused by his decision to sin willingly and knowingly. He adds: Macbeth is terrified by the warnings of his conscience, but he cannot surrender. That he acts with full knowledge of the evil only increases the pity and fear aroused by his deed. For this knowledge causes much of his suffering; it makes his condition far worse than


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

it would have been had he acted with less than complete knowledge.

Shanley is not the only critic to find something sympathetic in Macbeth, despite his ruthless and violent ways. In his article ‘‘Macbeth as Tragic Hero,’’ Wayne C. Booth claims that Macbeth’s failing was less about having deplorable character and moral fiber, and more about lack of perception. He maintains that Macbeth does not understand the external forces working so hard to manipulate him (namely, the witches and Lady Macbeth); he does not understand the distinction between killing on a battlefield and killing in civilian life; and ‘‘he does not understand his own character—he does not know what will be the effects of the evil act on his own future happiness.’’ Still, there is a difference between pitying a character and relating to him. Bloom maintains that readers and audience have difficulty not relating to Macbeth. He answers the question of why this is so by explaining that Macbeth ‘‘so dominates [Shakespeare’s] play that we have nowhere else to turn.’’ As evidence, he notes how, although she is a strong character, Lady Macbeth is onstage very little; and readers do not have the chance to get to know other characters, such as Duncan, Malcolm, Banquo, and Macduff very well. Although the minor characters appear only briefly (usually because they are murdered) and their personas are not fully developed, readers and critics are drawn to them. Duncan, for example, is held up as an example of a good king in contrast to Macbeth’s figure as a bad king. Van Doren remarks, ‘‘Duncan was everything that Macbeth is not. We saw him briefly, but the brilliance of his contrast with the thane he trusted has kept his memory beautiful throughout a play whose every other feature has been hideous.’’ Similarly, Lady Macduff and her son appear fleetingly, but their fate evokes the pity of the audience and rouses more indignation toward Macbeth. A substantial body of criticism addresses Lady Macbeth. Her importance in the play and her position as a dominant woman in Western literature have prompted lengthy discussion and character evaluation. Ribner juxtaposes Lady Macbeth with Banquo in her role in Macbeth’s psychological makeup. He maintains that while Banquo represents the part of Macbeth’s divided nature that would ‘‘accept nature and reject

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 4 9

M a c b e t h

evil,’’ Lady Macbeth represents the other side. Numerous critics believe that left to his own devices, Macbeth would not have murdered Duncan and set into motion the tragic events of the play. Shanley explains that Lady Macbeth ‘‘could sway him because she understood him and loved him, and because he loved her and depended on her love and good thoughts of him.’’ While most commentary centers on the sheer strength and determination of Lady Macbeth, there are critics who find her less powerful than she seems, and even less powerful than her husband. Mark van Doren in Shakespeare asserts: When the crisis comes she will break sooner than her husband does, but her brittleness then will mean the same thing that her melodrama means now: she is a slighter person than Macbeth, has a poorer imagination, and holds in her mind less of that power which enables it to stand up under torture.

Aligned with Lady Macbeth are the witches, who are also female figures who seem in control of themselves and of Macbeth. He is easily manipulated by them, intellectually and emotionally. Critics often note that the witches and Lady Macbeth work in tandem (although not intentionally) to undo Macbeth. Commenting on the witches’ influence on Macbeth’s will, Bloom explains, ‘‘Between what Macbeth imagines and what he does, there is only a temporal gap, in which he himself seems devoid of will. The Weird Sisters, Macbeth’s Muses, take the place of that will.’’ In her article ‘‘‘Born of Woman’: Fantasies of Maternal Power in Macbeth,’’ Janet Adelman describes the dual influence of the witches and Lady Macbeth. She writes, ‘‘Lady Macbeth brings the witches’ power home: they get the cosmic apparatus, she gets the psychic force.’’ The themes in Macbeth, including evil, guilt and conscience, ambition, time, and the supernatural have garnered a great deal of critical attention. In his article for Shakespeare Quarterly, Ribner explores the theme of evil in depth. He boldly writes: Macbeth is in many ways Shakespeare’s maturest and most daring experiment in tragedy, for in this play he set himself to describe the operation of evil in all its manifestations: to define its very nature, to depict its seduction of man, and to show its effect upon all the planes of creation once it has been unleashed by one man’s sinful moral choice.

4 5 0


F o r

Ribner applauds Shakespeare’s use of blood imagery and darkness to reinforce his theme of evil, and he notes that Macbeth carries out evil in every aspect of his life. His personal relationships are destroyed by evil, as is his selfperception. An because he sought only the power of the crown and not the responsibilities, he invited evil into Scotland. Ribner explains, ‘‘On the level of the state Macbeth unleashes the greatest evils of which Shakespeare’s audience could conceive, tyranny, civil war, and an invading foreign army.’’ One of the more subtle themes running through Macbeth is time. The introduction of prophecy and the rush to fulfill it makes time seem to Macbeth and his wife something that can be controlled and manipulated by temporal beings. They see in the present signs of the future, and they look to the past for the same reason. Perhaps because of its subtlety, scholars often find the theme of time extremely pervasive and influential. Bloom comments, ‘‘What notoriously dominates this play, more than any other in Shakespeare, is time, time that is not the Christian mercy of eternity, but devouring time, death nihilistically regarded as finality.’’ Tom F. Driver in The Sense of History in Greek and Shakespearean Drama states plainly, ‘‘Much as he would like, Macbeth cannot separate the present from the past and the future. By the act of murder he has made his own history, and the rest of the play is the of the fulfillment of that history, ultimately self-defeating.’’ Few playwrights have demonstrated the kind of enduring popularity as Shakespeare has. As for Macbeth, its relevance is still upheld by scholars, students, professors, readers, and audience . To some, the play’s relevance is topical. In The Penguin New Writing, contributor Stephen Spender points to Macbeth as an obvious choice when seeking Shakespearean drama relevant to today’s world. He explains, for example, ‘‘It is impossible to read the lines beginning, ‘Our country sinks beneath the yoke; it weeps, it bleeds’ [act 4, scene 3, lines 38–39], without thinking of half a dozen countries under the yoke of a tyrant.’’ Although Spender’s comment was made in 1941, the observation is equally true today. To others, Macbeth endures for its universal appeal to the human spirit, even at its darkest. As Bloom suggests, ‘‘We are to journey inward to Macbeth’s heart of darkness, and there we will find ourselves

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

more truly and more strange, murderers in and of the spirit.’’ Ribner suggests a more positive, if surprising, reading of Macbeth when he points out that Macbeth’s ultimate downfall is the result of his own choices. He concludes, ‘‘We may thus, viewing the play in its totality, see good, through divine grace, inevitably emerging from evil and triumphant at the play’s end with a promise of rebirth.’’

A CLEARLY INTELLIGENT AND AMBITIOUS WOMAN, LADY MACBETH’S ROLE IS COMPLETELY DETERMINED BY HER HUSBAND’S. WITHOUT EVEN A NAME OF HER OWN, THE ONLY WAY SHE CAN ACHIEVE POWER IS IF HER HUSBAND FIRST ATTAINS IT.’’

CRITICISM Mary Ives Thompson and sco Aristide Ancona Thompson and Ancona analyze how the characters of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth undergo such dramatic transformations from the beginning of the play to the end. The critics contend that these transformations are rooted in the issue of gender roles, and specifically in the characters’ desire to escape from the rigidly defined roles that society has created for them. In Macbeth, both the title character and Lady Macbeth undergo a role reversal of sorts by the end of the play. In a world where fair is soul and the natural order is completely subverted, Macbeth becomes completely confident in his grab for power, while Lady Macbeth wanders the castle corridors at night bemoaning her unclean hands following the murder of Duncan and his guards. The question, then, is why these two characters change so much in their attitudes in the relatively short space of the drama. What could cause Macbeth, referred to by his own wife as ‘‘too full o’ the milk of human kindness to catch the nearest way’’ (1.5.17–18), to become completely remorseless in his bid for the crown, even to the point at which he eliminates not only his competitors for the throne but their progeny as well? And why has Lady Macbeth, who was so bent on ambition and power in the opening acts that she begged whatever spirits might be listening to ‘‘unsex me here / and fill me from the crown to the toe top-full / of direst cruelty!’’ (1.5.41–43), become a guilt-ridden somnambulist? Clearly, this role reversal revolves around the question of gender, specifically, the attempt to break out of rigidly defined roles for which persons might be unsuited. Lady Macbeth has several problems, the most notable of which are as follows: She is intelligent, she craves power, she is strong enough to determine what action


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

she must take to achieve her goals, and she is willing to turn to unsavory means to achieve her ends. Oh, yes, and she happens to be a female living in medieval Scotland. In short, Lady Macbeth’s dramatic role reversal and subsequent demise at her own hand can be traced back to one source: her own desire for some sort of power and the attempted overthrow or altering of the patriarchal order of her society that dictates a ive role for which she was completely unsuited. Tellingly, Macbeth opens with an initial act and scene populated entirely by female characters, the only Shakespeare play to do so. Immediately, by the very presence of the weird sisters, the audience is given to understand something unnatural is afoot. While clearly women, the witches display androgynous characteristics, leading Macbeth and Banquo to question their gender: ‘‘You should be women, / And yet your beards forbid me to interpret / That you are so’’ (1.3.53–47). The difficulty of gender characterization and the attempt on the part of the male characters to neatly file other people into a clear, gender-specific role (the witches should be women) foreshadows Lady Macbeth’s plea two scenes later—she too wishes for sex to be taken away or at least fundamentally changed, so she will not display the weaknesses inherent in all females: comion and tender-heartedness. The reason for her desire for this change is apparent when the audience beholds her ambition. Macbeth refers to her as his ‘‘dearest partner of greatness’’ (1.5.11), something unheard of in the paternalistic and bloodyminded society in which she lives. How else can Lady Macbeth hope to live up to the faith that Macbeth has placed in her unless she rids herself of her female imperfections of kindness and mercy? In a society that rewards bloody murder if done in the service of

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 5 1

M a c b e t h

and then covered with blood and gore. While most characters in the play cling to this warlike and vengeful ideal of the masculine, one character displays what more modern readers might determine to be a ‘‘real man,’’ one who exemplifies the often conflicting characteristics of physical strength and emotional depth. When Macduff discovers his wife and children are slaughtered, he is understandably moved. Malcolm, however, advises him to ‘‘Dispute it like a man’’ (4.3.221), or take up arms against Macbeth and bring him down. In this masculine world, the only acceptable reaction to treachery and murder is vengeance. Macduff acknowledges action is important and that he will soon seek revenge, but emotions also must play a role: I shall do so; But I must also feel it as a man. I cannot but such things were, That were most precious to me.

Brid Brennan as Lady Macbeth in Act V, scene I, at the Royal Shakespeare Theatre, 1996 (! Donald Cooper/Photostage. Reproduced by permission)

the state (three scenes earlier, the captain is heard praising Macbeth for dispatching the traitorous Macdonwald when he ‘‘unseamed him from the nave to the chops / And fixed his head upon our battlements’’ (1.2.22–23)), how can a mere woman hope to achieve any power if not through her husband? And if that husband is too plagued by conscience or kindness to commit murder without cause, how can Lady Macbeth not pray to have her feminity revoked, so she may be the one to do the deed herself? The only way for a man to be successful in Macbeth’s world is to take arms and end the life of another. Macbeth’s early success against the traitorous Macdonwald paves the way for other bloody acts that will allow him to gain greater glory and fame. At first unsure of his course toward what he views as greatness, he progresses nevertheless toward his destiny. The speech in which he speaks of his hallucination of the bloody dagger indicates the only tools of his creativity: an unsheathed weapon, first clean

4 5 2


F o r

This brief interlude into acknowledgment and even valuing of emotion is short lived, for in the next few lines Macduff ‘‘pulls himself together’’ and steels himself for what he must do as a man: Oh, I could play the woman with mine eyes And braggart with my tongue! But, gentle heavens, Cut short this intermission. Front to front Bring thou this fiend of Scotland and myself; Within my sword’s length set him. The only male character willing to recognize his ‘‘feminine side’’ is quickly pulled back into the world of brutality and vengeance, and it is in this world and against this backdrop of violent tendencies that Lady Macbeth exists. A clearly intelligent and ambitious woman, Lady Macbeth’s role is completely determined by her husband’s. Without even a name of her own, the only way she can achieve power is if her husband first attains it. Only with Macbeth as king can Lady Macbeth be queen. How frustrating it must be for such a strong woman to be forced to rely on such a weak vessel! Following the lead of all the successful males of whom she knows, Lady Macbeth plans a quick succession to the throne for her husband and taunts him into participation with what she views as his own weakness and lightness of affection towards her. When Macbeth’s conscience torments him to the

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

point at which he decides he cannot go through with the planned murder, she responds: . . . Was the hope drunk Wherein you dressed yourself?. Hath it slept since? And wakes it now, to look so green and pale At what it did so freely? From this time Such I thy love. (1.7.36–40) This response to her husband’s qualms makes her seem cruel and manipulative, a shrew who must use her sexuality to twist her husband’s love to her own selfish ends, and to a certain extent this is true. On the other hand, what other options were available to her? If she wanted power for her husband (and, by extension, for herself) she must force Macbeth back on the bloody path to regicide. And when Macbeth responds he cannot kill Duncan because, ‘‘I dare do all that may become a man; / Who dares do more is none,’’ (1.7.46–48) Lady Macbeth rightly points out what manly behavior means in her experience: . . . What beast was’t, then, That made you break this enterprise to me? When you durst do it, then you were a man; And, to be more than what you were, you would Be so much more the man. The idea for the murder was her husband’s—Lady Macbeth has simply determined a practical course of action to help fulfill the weird sisters’ prophecy and now that the time for completion is nearing, Macbeth is having pangs of conscience that are disrupting the scheme. How intolerably infuriating this must be to the ‘‘dearest partner of greatness,’’ to see everything she had been allowed to hope for slipping away through the perceived weakness of one man! In one sense, Lady Macbeth fulfills her role as helpmate of her husband, although in an ittedly gruesome fashion. She attends her husband at the murder, eggs him on, and completes the task of incriminating the grooms by smearing them with blood, all of which is completely outside the guidelines of acceptable female behavior but is done to assist her husband. Had she been a stereotypical Scottish wife of the period, she would have known nothing of her husband’s business dealings and would have been content to wait for Macbeth to bring home guests for her to entertain. Instead, when


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

Duncan is itted to her home, she plans and participates in the murder, and she shows much self-awareness of prospective guild as she does so, informing Macbeth, ‘‘These deeds must not be thought / After these ways; so, it will make us mad’’ (2.2.37–38). The realization of wrongdoing is upon her; nevertheless, she knows that her own mind might turn on her if she dwells too heavily on what she has done. Macbeth’s mind already displays some misgivings, but as the play progresses, he will follow the second counsel of the witches and rush headlong toward his doom in the surety of his invincibility. The strong female in this case is the one whose mental capacities will degrade as the drama moves to its end, since the idea of a thinking woman in a position of power was still viewed as unnatural and could not be allowed. It would not be possible to have Macbeth killed and Lady Macbeth left alive—what would the male-governed society do with her? Would Malcolm or any of the others hold her guilty for her actions? Could they even conceive of the idea of a woman so filled with cunning and treachery? After all, Macduff speaks of Malcolm’s mother in 4.3 as an ideal woman who was ‘‘Oft’ner upon her knees than on her feet.’’ (111) In this society, all women are fit to do is watch, wait, and pray. Would Malcolm have been able to execute a woman, even one he knows to be a ‘‘fiendlike queen’’? No, leaving Lady Macbeth alive and having the question of punishment appropriate for a female would have been a loose end in an otherwise tight drama, and so Lady Macbeth must punish and quietly remove herself from the reach of male justice by taking her own life. She operates completely in her own sphere, untouched by interaction with any character other than her husband. Even in her dealings with him, Lady Macbeth is the stronger of the two, taking the lead and pushing for her goals. Only in her sleep does her femininity of her conscience have free reign, and even then the physician recognizes she is the only one who can minister to herself. Throughout the drama, no man can truly assist Lady Macbeth. Perhaps this isolation occurs because, through much of the play, Lady Macbeth is viewed as an outsider even by herself. The laws of nature do not apply to her in the same way they do to everyone else in the play. When the grooms are lulled to sleep by alcohol, Lady M notes, ‘‘That which hath made them drunk hath made me bold; / What hath quenched them that

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 5 3

M a c b e t h

given me fire’’ (2.2.1–2). Even strong drink acts differently in her system, making her appear an aberration indeed. When Macbeth realizes the extent of his villainy immediately after Duncan’s murder and begins to fear he hears knocking, Lady Macbeth responds to his qualms: My hands are of your color, but I shame To wear a heart so white. (Knock.) I hear a knocking At the south entry. Retire we to our chamber. A little water clears us of this deed. How easy is it, then! Your constancy Hath left you unattended. Lady Macbeth hears the same sounds as Macbeth, but they raise no feelings of guilt or panic; rather, they bring out her practical nature, and she s her husband as he falters in his purpose. She will continue fulfilling at lease one role of the attentive wife and will be at Macbeth’s side to assist him when his hallucinations worsen, and he sees the ghost of Banquo. It is Lady Macbeth who again subverts the natural order by allowing all the guests to leave the chamber quickly and without regard for rank as she directs them to, ‘‘Stand not upon the order of your going, / But go at once.’’’ (3.4.120–121) Attempting to function in male society while still outwardly appearing to be a dutiful wife, she throws aside the masculine rules of order, perhaps out of ignorance or perhaps out of desperation. None of this is meant to excuse the reprehensible actions of either character, however. It is merely an explanation of why one woman could act with such a stony heard and dauntless purpose to kill an old man of whom she was ittedly fond. (Indeed, the only reason Lady Macbeth cannot bring herself to kill Duncan when Macbeth falters is Duncan’s ing resemblance to her own father. The primitive ban against patricide still exists in her psyche, even if regicide is an acceptable course of action in her desperation and ambition.) Both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are acting in unnatural ways, or at least in ways in which a perversion of the ‘‘might makes right’’ principle is in play. They have departed from violence in service of the State and moved to violence for personal gain, something which the playwright has a duty to condemn. The messages of the drama resonates: Unnatural behavior on the part of both sexes can only lead to calamity as Nature itself rebels and rises up to restore accepted order. In this,

4 5 4


F o r

one of the only Shakespeare plays in which the protagonist can be classified as evil rather than simply flawed, Shakespeare seems to be indicating that a woman as unnatural as Lady Macbeth cannot be allowed to live or flourish. The only acceptable outcome for this rebel against her sex is for her to take her own life. Lady Macbeth is not the first unruly woman in the drama to be constrained or returned to her acceptable role. We see the three witches have overstepped their bounds when Hecate appears in 3.5 and chides them for their of Macbeth, ‘‘ . . . a wayward son, / Spiteful and wrathful, who, as others do, / Loves for his own ends, not for you’’ (11–13). Even the witches have an established hierarchy, and their prophecies can only be used for the benefit of an acceptable subject. Macbeth is not a good choice for the hearing of the prophecy, and the three sisters must now restore the balance they had disturbed. Their last prophecy to Macbeth, of course, leads him to the false sense of security when he believes he can never be harmed. When he listens to and heeds this prophecy, he and Lady Macbeth begin to switch roles in the drama. He becomes completely blind to any danger to himself, and Lady Macbeth changes from a murderer who philosophically states, ‘‘Things without all remedy / Should be without regard. What’s done is done’’ (3.2.13–14) to a disturbed sleepwalker who paces futilely every night in search of enough water to cleanse her of her sins. Macbeth is stepping up to the role he wanted but was afraid to kill for, and Lady Macbeth’s strength is no longer needed. A displaced person, she has no further role in the of her husband and will revert to the more traditional feminine role. As he becomes stronger, she weakens, for two such blindly driven characters are not needed to rule. Finally, with her suicide, she removes herself from the stage completely, leaving her husband not to mourn her ing but to simply comment, ‘‘She should have died hereafter.’’ Lady M’s downfall comes more quickly than Macbeth’s, for she has rebelled more against her femininity than he has against his masculinity. Macbeth has taken society’s approval of state-sanctioned murder too far, to the extent of killing and supplanting the head of state, but his behavior is an extension of appropriate masculine action for his military-minded world. Lady Macbeth, however, has stepped

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

WHAT DO I READ NEXT? Clarence Valentine Boyer’s chapter on Macbeth in The Villain as Tragic Hero in Elizabethan Tragedy (1914; reprint, 1964) presents a detailed examination of Macbeth’s character, tracing the development of his thought throughout the play’s action. ! Edited by John Russell Brown, 1982’s Focus on ‘‘Macbeth’’ contains eleven essays on the play by prominent critics. The subjects of these essays range from thematic concerns and language to theatrical considerations of the play. ! Herbert R. Coursen provides a reliable and informative guide to Macbeth in Macbeth: A Guide to the Play (1997). Chapters cover the background of the play, general thematic considerations, and comments on various productions.

apparent in its language and imagery. Foakes argues that the drama’s simplicity of action and character belies the fact that Shakespeare was attempting to develop a new kind of tragedy distinct from Hamlet, King Lear, and Othello.

!

!

In a chapter about Macbeth in Arnold Kettle’s 1964 work, Shakespeare in a Changing World, J. K Walton analyzes Macbeth’s individualism and associates it with the play’s imagery of isolation and sterility. Walton also notes that opposed to this individualism is a combination of forces that challenge Macbeth; he states that the play’s optimism is partly suggested by ‘‘the fact that a unified people overcome the tyrant.’’

!

L. C. Knights provides a general overview of Macbeth’s major themes and images in Some Shakespearean Themes (1959), noting that ‘‘the essential structure of Macbeth . . . is to be sought in the poetry.’’

!

Editor Edwin Quinn analyzes the world of Macbeth in 1978’s How to Read Shakespearean Tragedy. He divides Shakespeare’s world into four parts: the physical, the psychological, the political, and the moral. Leary considers each of these aspects separately, but maintains that they are ‘‘all parts of a unified whole.’’

!

In Stratford Papers on Shakespeare (1963), editor B. W. Jackson demonstrates the overall intensity of Macbeth, which is chiefly

In an article for Shakespeare Quarterly, (October 1953) titled ‘‘The Unity of Macbeth,’’ Brent Stirling proposes that the poetic and dramatic structures of Macbeth are unified in four traditionally Elizabethan themes: darkness, sleep, raptness, and contradiction.

completely outside the bounds of femininity and must be punished, even if it is by her own hand. More self-aware than Macbeth to the end, she does not wait for anyone else to end her unnatural existence—she does it willingly to herself,

quietly and offstage. Macbeth, on the other hand, determines not to surrender and not to fall upon his sword, for at the end his overconfidence blinds him to any possible danger, and he only completely understands his own doom

!

!

!

In James I and the Politics of Literature: Jonson, Shakespeare, Donne, and Their Contemporaries (1990), Jonathan Goldberg provides important historical and cultural information about the context in which Shakespeare and his peers (and rivals) penned classic and enduring works of literature. Anthony Holden’s 2002 book, William Shakespeare: An Illustrated Biography, offers readers an honest attempt to present the facts of Shakespeare’s life, separate from the legends that surround the playwright. The book is brought to life by the inclusion of illustrations and ephemera related to the Bard’s life.


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 5 5

M a c b e t h

when nature itself, in the form of a mobile Birnam Wood, and another man outside of nature yet willing to restore order, Macduff, takes his life away from him. Of final interest in this commentary on gender psyche in the drama, one last area of symbolism exists and is particularly important in the context of Lady Macbeth’s suicide. If nature is personified as a female presence, it is interesting to note the male use of the feminine boughs of the Wood as a shield until subterfuge is no longer needed, at which time nature is cast away and steel swords again become the most important implements. Likewise, Macduff was once sheltered by a woman who was later discarded as unnecessary in the birth process—after all, ‘‘Macduff was from his mother’s womb untimely ripped.’’ (5.8.16) Even the witches who opened the play are displaced, and it is a male figure who will offer the final words to sum up the moral and message of the work. The drama ends with the natural (and, what else? patriarchal) order of society and rank being restored, as is evidenced by Malcolm’s final statement, ‘‘ . . . what needful else / we will perform in measure, time, and place’’ (5.8.73–73). However, try as Malcolm might, the audience knows that his reign will end with or shortly after his own death, for according to the prophecy it is the murdered Banquo whose children will gain the throne. If the weird sisters’ prophecy is correct, how long can it be until nature is again in upheaval? While Shakespeare himself must stress the return of the genders to their rightful places, it seems only a matter of time until the feminine intrudes once again in this masculine world, no matter how carefully kings attempt to structure their legacy.

THE MURDER OF A SLEEPING GUEST, THE MURDER OF A SLEEPING KING, THE MURDER OF A SAINTLY OLD MAN, THE MURDER, AS IT WERE, OF SLEEP ITSELF, CARRIES WITH IT THE APPROPRIATE RETRIBUTION OF INSOMNIA.’’

Images of sickness, the critic contends, signify the ‘‘disease of tyranny’’ which has infected Scotland, and which can only be cured by ‘‘bleeding or purgation.’’ Muir also observes a contrast between the powers of light and darkness in Macbeth. Darkness pervades all the action in Macbeth’s world, whereas light manifest itself in the scenes in England and those in which Malcolm and Macduff restore order at the end of the play. Other dualities related to the light/dark motif include contrasts between angel and devil, heaven and hell, and truth and falsehood.

Source: Mary Ives Thompson and sco Aristide Ancona, ‘‘He Says/She Says: Shakespeare’s Macbeth (a Gender/Personality Study),’’ in Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 3–4, October 2005, pp. 59–69.

Kenneth Muir Muir analyzes various image patterns in Macbeth. The first pattern the critic examines is that of babies and breast-feeding. According to Muir, infants symbolize pity throughout the play, and breast-milk represents ‘‘humanity, tenderness, sympathy, natural human feelings, [and] the sense of kinship, all of which have been outraged by the murderers.’’ Another group of images focuses on sickness and medicine, all of which occur, significantly, in the last three acts of the play, after Macbeth has ascended the throne.

4 5 6


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

Lady Macbeth, Macbeth, and Banquo’s Ghost, Act III, scene iv


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 5 7

M a c b e t h

4 5 8


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 5 9

M a c b e t h

4 6 0


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

Source: Kenneth Muir, ‘‘Image and Symbol in Macbeth,’’ in Shakespeare Survey: An Annual Survey of Shakesperian Study and Production, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 19, 1966, pp. 45–54.

J. Lyndon Shanley Shanley considers the tragic context of Macbeth’s evil actions in an attempt to determine whether or not his downfall warrants sympathy or arouses


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 6 1

M a c b e t h

fear at the end of the play. The critic maintains that Macbeth has a fundamentally different experience from Shakespeare’s other great tragic heroes: he does not achieve a great recovery in the end because his actions throughout the play were ignoble. Shanley suggests, however, that Macbeth’s end is perhaps more tragic than that of the other heroes because he ultimately loses himself to a degree that none of them does. According to the critic, our pity for Macbeth might therefore lie in the fact that by declaring that life signifies nothing, he acknowledges ‘‘the almost complete destruction of the human spirit.’’ Shanley also observes that our ability to judgment on the hero’s ruin is further complicated by several factors. Nowhere can we see the essential humanity of Shakespeare more clearly than in Macbeth, as he shows that the darkest evil may well be human, and so, though horrible, understandable in of our own lives and therefore pitiable and terrible. Yet nowhere apparently are we so likely to miss the center of Shakespeare’s view of the action; for Macbeth, while less complex than Shakespeare’s other major tragedies, frequently raises the crucial question: Is Macbeth’s fall really tragic? Many who are deeply moved by the action of the play cannot satisfactorily explain their feelings. The doctrine of Tout comprendre, c’est tout pardonner [if all is understood then all is pardoned] leads them to think (most of the time) that there is no guilt, that there should be no punishment. When faced with unpardonable evil and inescapable punishment for the guilty, and when moved at the same time to pity and fear by the suffering of the evil-doer, they are confused. Since they confound the understanding of an act with the excusing of it, they are prevented from understanding acts (and their reactions to them) for which excuse is impossible. Some, of course, find an excuse for Macbeth in the witches. But those who do not see him as the victim of agents of destiny appear to wonder if they have not been tricked into sympathy by Shakespeare’s art. How, they ask, in view of Macbeth’s monstrous career and sorry end, so different from those of Hamlet, Lear, or Othello, how can his fortunes win our pity and arouse our fear? Macbeth is defeated as is no other of Shakespeare’s great tragic figures. No pity and reverent awe attend his death. Dying off-stage, he

4 6 2


F o r

MACBETH IS DEFEATED AS IS NO OTHER OF SHAKESPEARE’S GREAT TRAGIC FIGURES. NO PITY AND REVERENT AWE ATTEND HIS DEATH. DYING OFF-STAGE, HE IS, AS IT WERE, SHUFFLED OFF, IN KEEPING WITH HIS DREADFUL STATE AND THE DESIRE OF ALL IN HIS WORLD TO BE RID OF HIM.’’

is, as it were, shuffled off, in keeping with his dreadful state and the desire of all in his world to be rid of him. The sight of his ‘‘cursed head’’ is the signal for glad hailing of Malcolm as king; all thought of him is dismissed with ‘‘this dead butcher and his fiend-like queen’’ [V. ix. 35]. The phrase is dramatically fitting, but it does not express the whole truth that Shakespeare shows us of Macbeth’s story. Seldom do we feel so strongly both the justice of the judgment and the retribution and at the same time pity for him on whom they fall; for behind this last scene lies the revelation of Macbeth’s almost total destruction. Hamlet, Lear, and Othello lose much that is wonderful in human life; their fortunes are sad and terrible. So near, their stories seem to say, is man’s enjoyment of the world’s best gifts—and yet so far, because his own errors and weakness leave him unable to control his world. To lose Hamlet’s delight in man and his powers, and the glory of life; to have Cordelia’s love and tender care snatched away, after such suffering as Lear’s; or to have thrown away the jewel of one’s life as did Othello—this is painful. But their fortunes might have been worse. At one time they were: when the losers thought that what they had served and believed in were mere shows that made a mockery of their noblest love; when life and all their efforts seemed to have been utterly without meaning. But before the end they learned that their love had value and that life had meaning. On this knowledge depends the twofold effect of the heroes’ deaths: death at once seals, without hope of restitution, the loss of the world and its gifts, but at the same time it brings relief from the pain of loss. Furthermore, this knowledge restores the courage and nobility of soul that

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

Macbeth with the witches and apparitions, Act IV, scene I, at the Young Vic Theatre, London 1975 (! Donald Cooper/Photostage. Reproduced by permission)

raise them far above their enemies and the ruins of their world. Without this knowledge, Hamlet and Lear and Othello were far less than themselves, and life but a fevered madness. With it, there is tragedy but not defeat, for the value of what is best in them is confirmed beyond question. But in the end of Macbeth we have something fundamentally different. Macbeth’s spirit, as well as his world, is all but destroyed; no great recovery is possible for him. He does not, for he cannot, see that what he sought and valued most was good and worthy of his efforts. He is aware that he has missed much; shortly before Lady Macbeth dies, he broods over the ‘‘honour, love, obedience, troops of friends’’ [V. iii. 25] he has lost and cannot hope to regain. But this knowledge wins no ease for his heart. It does not raise him above the conditions that have ruined him. Macbeth, it is true, is no longer tortured as he once was, but freedom from torture has led only to the peace of despair in which he looks at life and denounces it as ‘‘a tale told by an idiot’’ [V. v. 26–7].


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

Bitter as life was for Hamlet, Lear, and Othello, it was not empty. But all Macbeth’s efforts, all his hopes and dreams were in vain, because of the way he went; and when he discovers that they were, he concludes that nothing can be realized in life. Hence his terrible indictment of life—terrible because it reveals him to be all but hopelessly lost in the world of Shakesperean tragedy, as he desperately and ironically blasphemes against a basic tenet of that world, to the truth of which his own state bears overwhelming evidence: that man’s life signifies everything. It is the despair and irony in this blasphemy that makes Macbeth’s lot so awful and pitiful. We see the paralyzing, the almost complete destruction of a human spirit. The threat of hostile action galvanizes Macbeth into action to protect himself, but the action is little more than an instinctive move toward self-preservation and the last gesture of despair. He has not even the bitter satisfaction of rebelling and saying, ‘‘As flies to wanton boys, are we to the gods’’ [King Lear, IV. i. 36]. Only

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 6 3

M a c b e t h

sheer animal courage remains to flash out and remind us of a Macbeth once courageous in an honorable cause. This reminder is pitiful, for Macbeth has not even the slim hope of a trapped animal which, if it fights loose, has something to escape to. All Macbeth did resulted in nothing; whatever he does now will result in nothing but the anguish of meaningless action. It is hard enough to realize that one has been on the wrong track for part of life; to be convinced that there is no right track to get on because there is no place for any track to go—this is to be lost with no hope at all. At the very end we see some saving touches of humanity in Macbeth: he has not lost all human virtue; he would have no more of Macduff’s blood on his soul; and even with the collapse of his last security, his bravery does not falter. These touches show him a man still, and not a fiend, but they by no means reestablish him in his former self. There is no greatness in death for him. Rather than the human spirit’s capacity for greatness in adversity, we see its possible ruin in evil. Because we never see Macbeth enjoying the possession of the great prize he sought, and because from the beginning of his temptation we have no hope that he will be able to enjoy it, his loss of the world’s gifts is not so poignant as that of Hamlet, Lear, or Othello. But to a degree that none of them does, Macbeth loses himself, and this is most tragic of all.

Shakespeare presents Macbeth as one who had hardly any chance to escape guilt. The concatenation of circumstances which make Macbeth’s temptation is such as to seem a trap. At the very moment when he is returning victorious from a battle in which he has played a chief part in saving his country from disaster, there comes to him a suggestion—touching old dreams and desires—that he may be king. Shakespeare uses the witches to convey the danger of the suggestion. The witches and their prophecies are poetic symbols of the bafflingly indeterminate character of the events that surround men. The witches force nothing; they advise nothing; they simply present facts. But they confound fair and foul; just so, events may be good or ill. The witches will not stay to explain their greetings any more than events will interpret themselves. The witches’ prophecies and the events that forever surround men are dangerous because they may appear simple and are not, because they may be so alluring as to stultify prudence, and because their true significance may be very hard to come at. Depending on conditions, they may be harmless, or they may be delusive, insidious, and all but impossible to read correctly.

It may be objected, however, that Macbeth alone of Shakespeare’s great tragic figures is fully aware of the evil of the act by which he sets in motion the train of events leading to his ruin. His culpability seriously weakens the sympathy of many. In the face of this difficulty, some interpreters justify sympathy for Macbeth by seeing him as the victim of the witches, the agents of destiny. This point of view, however, seems to cut through the complex knot of human life as Shakespeare saw it, instead of following the various strands which make it up. We cannot dodge Macbeth’s responsibility and guilt—he never does.

Macbeth is in no condition to read them aright. He had restrained his desire for greatness in the past since he would not do the wrong which was needed to win greatness. The hunger of his ambitious mind had not died, however; it had only been denied satisfaction. Now, when the sense of his own power and his taste of it are high indeed, the old hunger is more than reawakened; it is nourished with hope, as immediate events seem to establish the soundness of the suggestion. Enough hope to lead him to ponder the suggestion seriously, and then, in spite of an attempt to put it out of his mind since he recognizes the evil of his thoughts, to retail the wonderful news of possible greatness to his wife.

His ruin is caused by the fact that he sins: he wilfully commits an act which he knows to be wrong. This ruin and sin are seen to be tragic, as Shakespeare, like Dante, reveals the pity and fear in a man’s succumbing to grievous temptation, and in the effects of sin on his subsequent thoughts and deeds. Macbeth’s guilt and the circumstances upon which it depends do not decrease our pity and fear; they produce it; for

There follow immediately two events which press the matter on most hastily. The king proclaims his eldest son as his heir, and in the next breath announces his visit to Macbeth’s castle. Thus, while desire and hope are fresh, Macbeth sees put before him, first, an obstacle which time will only make greater, and then an opportunity for him to prevent time from working against him. ‘‘If it were done when ’tis done, then ’twere

4 6 4


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

well it were done quickly’’ [I. vii. 1–2]. In fact, it must be done quickly if it is to be done at all. Desire, apparent promise of fulfillment, need for speedy action, and immediate opportunity fall together so rapidly as to create an all but inescapable force. Yet Macbeth would have resisted temptation had he been left to himself. Great though his hunger for power and glory, especially when whetted by such circumstances, it would not have completely overcome his fears and scruples. Even if he were to jump the life to come, he knew that if he could and would kill Duncan, another might well do the same for him. On a higher plane, the double loyalty he owed to the king held him back. Finally, a point that reveals the virtue that was in him, he felt the goodness of Duncan so strongly that killing him seemed too terrible a thing to do. Worldly prudence, loyalty, reverence for what is good—these turned Macbeth back. Lady Macbeth’s fears were well founded; his nature was not such as to let him ‘‘catch the nearest way.’’ But that nature could, as she felt, be worked. It was good, but not firm in its goodness. Macbeth is a moderately good man, no better, but also no worse, than the next one. The point is (and it is a grim one) that the virtue of the ordinarily good man is not enough to keep him from disaster under all possible circumstances— especially when some of them are such as may be for good or evil. This was the nature of Lady Macbeth’s influence on Macbeth. She could sway him because she understood him and loved him, and because he loved her and depended on her love and good thoughts of him. She could and would have urged him to noble deeds had occasion arisen. To prevent her from urging him on to evil ones, he needed more than the ordinary firmness to act as he saw right. But to cut clear of such a source of strength and comfort is difficult; too difficult for Macbeth. It is the old story of the perversion of the potentially good, and of the problem of getting only the good from the baffling mixture of good and evil in all things. Just after Macbeth has decided to give up his murderous plot, but before intention can harden to resolve, Lady Macbeth adds the force of her appeals to that of Macbeth’s desires and the press of circumstances. She sees his chance to win the prize of life; she knows he wants it, as she does not know in their full strength his


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

reasons for renouncing it. She beats down, at least long enough for her immediate purpose, the fears and scruples which would otherwise have kept him from the crown, and murder and ruin. She does not answer Macbeth’s scruples; her attack is personal. Whether she knows or simply feels his need of her iration and , she strikes at the right point. The spur of ambition did not drive Macbeth too hard toward his great opportunity, but her goading taunts he could not withstand, though they drove him on to horrors. All this does not excuse Macbeth; no excuse is possible for one who, with full knowledge of the nature of the act, murders a good man to whom he owes hospitality, loyalty, and gratitude. Shakespeare makes us realize, however, how dangerous the battle, how practically irresistible may be the forces arrayed against a man. Some men are saved from evil because they marry a Cordelia or a Viola [in Twelfth Night]; others because opportunity never favors their desires; and still others because the stakes do not justify the risk of being caught in evil doing. For Macbeth, the stakes are the highest, the opportunity golden, and the encouragement to evil from a wife whom he loves and needs. Macbeth is terrified by the warnings of his conscience, but he cannot surrender. That he acts with full knowledge of the evil only increases the pity and fear aroused by his deed. For this knowlege causes much of his suffering; it makes his condition far worse than it would have been had he acted with less than complete knowledge; and, finally, it emphasizes the power of the trickery, the lure, and the urging to which he was subjected. We pity his suffering even as he does evil because we understand why he could not hold on to the chance which he ought to have taken to save himself; and we are moved to fear when we see his suffering and understand how slight may be the chance to escape it. Once that chance is lost greater suffering and evil follow inescapably. The bloody career on which Macbeth now embarks can no more be excused than could his first crime, but it increases rather than detracts from our pity and fear. The trap of temptation having been sprung, there is no escape for Macbeth, and his struggles to escape the consequences of his sin serve only to ensnare him more deeply. As we witness that struggle, our pity and fear increase because we

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 6 5

M a c b e t h

feel how incompetent he is to do anything but struggle as he does. Evil brings its own suffering with it, but Macbeth cannot learn from it. The unknown fifteenth-century author of The Book of the Poor in Spirit wrote of evil and suffering: ‘‘One’s own proper suffering comes from one’s own sins and he suffers quite rightly who lives in sins, and each sin fosters a special spiritual suffering . . . This kind of suffering is similar to the suffering in hell, for the more one suffers there the worse one becomes. This happens to sinners; the more they suffer through sin the more wicked they become and they fall more and more into sufferings in their effort to escape.’’ Just so did Shakespeare conceive of Macbeth’s state. Macbeth has no enemy he can see, such as Iago or one of Lear’s savage daughters; he is within himself. In first overriding the warnings of his conscience, he brings on the blindness which makes it impossible for him to perceive his own state and things outside him as they really are, and which therefore sends him in pursuit of a wholly illusory safety. When he puts away all thought of going back on his first evil deed, he deals the last blow to his conscience which once urged him to the right, and he blinds himself entirely. No sooner does he gain what he wanted than he is beset by fears worse than those he overrode in murdering Duncan. But having overridden the proper fears, he cannot deal rightly with the new ones. His horror of murder is lost in the fear of discovery and revenge, and the fear of losing what he has sacrificed so much to gain. Briefly at least he wishes the murder undone and Duncan waking to the knocking at the gate. But just as earlier he thought, but failed, to put the witches’ prophecies and his evil thoughts out of mind, so now his better thoughts die. By the time he appears in answer to the knocking at the gate, he is firmly set on a course to make good the murder of Duncan and to keep himself safe.

I had liv’d a blessed time; for from this instant There’s nothing serious in mortality; All is but toys; renown and grace is dead; The wine of life is drawn, and the mere lees Is left this vault to brag of. [II. iii. 91–6] Irony could not be sharper. At the very moment when he seems to himself to be complete master of the situation, Macbeth, all unknowingly, utters the bitter truth about his state. He is still to be troubled by thoughts of evil, but the drive of his desire for peace from fear is greater; and to win security he is hurrying on the way in which he thinks it lies, but it is the way to the utter, empty loneliness he describes for us here. Macbeth finds that the death of the grooms was not enough; Banquo and Fleance must go if he is to be free from torment. Through Macbeth’s conversation first with Banquo about his journey, then with the murderers, and finally with Lady Macbeth, we comprehend to its full extent the disastrous change in him; he now contemplates murder with hope rather than horror. He still sees it as something to be hidden: ‘‘Come, seeling night, scarf up the tender eye of pitiful day’’ [III. ii. 46–7]. But he is willing to do more evil since he believes it will insure his safety: ‘‘Things bad begun make good themselves by ill’’ [III. ii. 55]. With the appearance of Banquo’s ghost comes the last flicker of conscience, but also an increasing terror of discovery and revenge which drives Macbeth further than ever: ‘‘For mine own good all causes shall give way’’ [III. iv. 134–35].

All is terrible irony from this point on. With a new decisiveness Macbeth kills the grooms in Duncan’s chamber; alive, they were potential witnesses; dead, they can serve as plausible criminals. Then he plays brilliantly the part of a griefstricken host and loyal subject:

The only thing he can gain in his blinded state is the very worst for him. He now seeks out the witches to get that reassurance in his course which he cannot find in himself. Although they will not stay for all his questions, he unhesitatingly accepts their equivocations; since they do reassure him, his doubts of them are gone. With their answers, and having lost ‘‘the initiate fear that wants hard use’’ and being no longer ‘‘young in deed’’ [III. iv. 142–43]. Macbeth enjoys the sense of security of any gangster or tyrant who has the unshrinking will to crush any possible opponents, and who thinks he has power to do so with impunity. All that he has gained, however, is the freedom to commit ‘‘every sin that has a name to it’’ [IV. iii. 59–60].

Had I but died an hour before this chance,

His delusion is complete; his ruin inevitable. Not until he experiences the bitter fruition of his

4 6 6


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

M a c b e t h

earthly crown does he discover what has happened to him. Even then, however, he sees only in part; the blindness he suffered when he succumbed to temptation was never to be lightened; and hence the final irony of a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing. [V. v. 26–8] The action of Macbeth evokes a somber ‘‘there but for the grace of God.’’ We understand but we do not therefore pardon all. Rather we acknowledge the evil and the guilt and so acquiesce in the inevitable retribution, but at the same time we are deeply moved by Macbeth’s suffering and ruin because we are acutely aware of the dangerous forces before which he falls, and because we recognize their power over one like ourselves—a moderately good man who succumbs to temptation and who, having succumbed, is led to more evil to make good the first misstep, until there is no chance of withdrawal or escape. As we watch him, we know that he should not have fallen; he might have resisted; but Shakespeare’s vision here is of a world in which men can hardly do better amid the forces of circumstance; and in which, if men do no better, they must suffer, and lose not only the world but themselves as well. Of such suffering and loss is tragedy made. Source: J. Lyndon Shanley, ‘‘Macbeth: The Tragedy of Evil,’’ in College English, Vol. 22, No. 5, February 1961, pp. 305–11.

SOURCES Adelman, Janet, ‘‘‘Born of Woman’: Fantasies of Maternal Power in Macbeth,’’ in Cannibals, Witches, and Divorce: Estranging the Renaissance, edited by Marjorie Gruber, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987, pp. 90–121. Bloom, Harold, ‘‘Macbeth,’’ in Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human, Riverhead Books, 1998, pp. 516–45. Booth, Wayne C., ‘‘Macbeth as Tragic Hero,’’ in The Journal of General Education, Vol. 6, No. 1, October 1951, pp. 17–25. Driver, Tom F., ‘‘The Uses of Time: The Oedipus Tyrannus and Macbeth,’’ in The Sense of History in Greek and Shakespearean Drama, Columbia University Press, 1960, pp. 143–67.


F o r

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

McCarthy, Mary, ‘‘General Macbeth,’’ in The Writing on the Wall and Other Literary Essays, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1970, pp. 3–14. Ribner, Irving, ‘‘Macbeth: The Pattern of Idea and Action,’’ in Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 2, Spring 1959, pp. 147–59. Shakespeare, William, Macbeth, 2nd Series, edited by Kenneth Muir, Arden Shakespeare, 1997. Shanley, J. Lyndon, ‘‘Macbeth: The Tragedy of Evil,’’ in College English, Vol. 22, No. 5, February 1961, pp. 305–11. Spender, Stephen, ‘‘Books and the War—II,’’ in The Penguin New Writing, No. 3, February 1941, pp. 115–26. Van Doren, Mark, ‘‘Macbeth,’’ in Shakespeare, Henry Holt & Company, 1939, pp. 252–66

FURTHER READING Asp, Caroline, ‘‘‘Be bloody, bold and resolute’: Tragic Action and Sexual Stereotyping in Macbeth,’’ in Studies in Philology, Vol. 78, No. 2, Spring 1981, pp. 153–69. Asp discusses the effect that stereotyping sexual roles has on the major characters in Macbeth. Fosse, Jean, ‘‘The Lord’s Anointed Temple: A Study of Some Symbolic Patterns in Macbeth,’’ in Cahiers E´lisabe´thains, No. 6, October 1974, pp. 15–22. Fosse studies a group of images in Macbeth concerned with the human body to demonstrate that they are closely related and that they form an important symbolic pattern. Heilman, Robert B., ‘‘The Criminal as Tragic Hero: Dramatic Methods,’’ in Shakespeare Survey, Vol. 19, 1966, pp. 12–24. This article focuses on Shakespeare’s attempts to evoke sympathy for Macbeth despite the character’s increasing villainy. Heilman asserts that the playwright ‘‘so manages the situation that we become Macbeth or at least assent to complicity with him.’’ Jaarsma, Richard J., ‘‘The Tragedy of Banquo,’’ in Literature and Psychology, Vol. 17, Nos. 2–3, 1967, pp. 87–94. Jaarsma maintains that Banquo undergoes a radical change as a result of the witches’ prophesies and becomes Macbeth’s ‘‘silent accomplice’’ to Duncan’s murder. Jaarsma argues that by illustrating how evil affects a man ‘‘who is more realistic and less susceptible to it than Macbeth,’’ Shakespeare generalizes the tragedy of yielding to temptation. Kimbrough, Robert, ‘‘Macbeth: The Prisoner of Gender,’’ in Shakespeare Studies, Vol. 16, 1983, pp. 175–90.

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

4 6 7

M a c b e t h

Kimbrough examines the role of gender in Macbeth, asserting that the protagonist’s ‘‘failure to allow the tender aspects of his character to check those tough characteristics which are celebrated by the chauvinistic war ethic of his culture [and] championed by his wife’’ results first in his emotional, then his physical death. Moorthy, P. Rama, ‘‘Fear in Macbeth,’’ in Essays in Criticism, Vol. 23, No. 2, April 1973, pp. 154–66. Moorthy asserts that fear is a unifying theme in Macbeth. Moorthy examines how fear affects Macbeth in particular, noting that it is his peculiar fate to be continually exposed to its horrifying consequences.

4 6 8


F o r

Rackin, Phyllis, ‘‘Macbeth,’’ in Shakespeare’s Tragedies, Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., 1978. Rackin Offers a general discussion of Macbeth. Rackin’s book, which she states is ‘‘written for amateurs,’’ includes photographs from numerous theatrical productions. Sadler, Lynn Veach, ‘‘The Three Guises of Lady Macbeth,’’ CLA Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, September 1975, pp. 10–9. Sadler declares that Lady Macbeth is more imaginative than her husband and that she projects three guises in the play: the public Lady Macbeth, the woman who plays to the audience of her husband only, and the private Lady Macbeth.

S t u d e n t s ,

S e c o n d

E d i t i o n ,

V o l u m e

2

Macbeth Student Guide 5s6r1o

Overview 26281t

More details 6y5l6z

Related Documents 3h463d

Macbeth Student Guide 5s6r1o

Macbeth Study Guide Questions 6x223m

Macbeth (study Guide) 5o1k58

Macbeth Anticipation Guide 261mx

Student Guide 106o34

Student Guide 106o34

More Documents from "Jen Minjen" or35

Macbeth Student Guide 5s6r1o

Everything About Her Movie Summary.docx 13576x

Essay - Education With A Heart 3p2u1c

4p345f

Grade 9 Science Book Free j4h2g

Higher Care - Unit 2 - Sociology For Care v5d5q