ALLIANZ MIDDLE EAST SHIP MANAGEMENT LL c APPENDIX 2.8.0 - MASTER’S SMS REVIEW - CHECKLIST VESSEL NAME: _Setia Emas_____________________MASTER NAME: __Saepullah Tarigan__________________ Date Sign- On: _28-01-2016______________________
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The SMS had achieved the desired objective of maintaining safety of personnel Yes and property, and prevention of pollution to the environment and continuously improve the safety skills of the crew. No If No state reasons: ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………
Instructions and procedures for shipboard operations, familiarisation and crew training provided on board are sufficient. If No state comments: ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………
Yes
No
Master and chief engineer can identify the office personnel who they need to as required by the SMS. If No State reasons: .................................................................................. ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………
Yes
No
Masters understood the procedure for reporting accidents/incidents and nonconformity. If No state reasons: ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………
Yes
No
Master received sufficient and assistance from the Company with regards to accidents and incidents. If No state examples: ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………
Yes
No
Form No: SMSR Page 1 of 4
Rev No: 0
Effective Date: 04.04.2015
SOM-03-2
ALLIANZ MIDDLE EAST SHIP MANAGEMENT LL c 6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Master received sufficient training and familiarisation from Company to implement the SMS effectively. If No state reasons: ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………
Yes
No
Masters understood theirs overriding authority with regards to safety and pollution prevention and are able to exercise it if required. If No state comments: ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………
Yes
No
Crew ed vessel with the proper certificates and documents. If No state reasons: ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………
Yes
No
Sufficient crew is available on board as required by the Safe Manning to ensure continuity of safety of shipboard operations and pollution prevention. If No state reasons and identify the personnel required: ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Yes
No
Sufficient rest hours as required by STCW Fitness for Duty can be observed. If No state reasons: .................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ..............................................................................................................................
Yes
No
Sufficient period given during hand-over to ensure continuity in maintaining the SMS. If No state reasons: ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Yes
No
Yes
Form No: SMSR Page 2 of 4
12.
Rev No: 0
Effective Date: 04.04.2015
SOM-03-2
Sufficient information on relevant rules, regulations, codes and guidelines were available on board.
ALLIANZ MIDDLE EAST SHIP MANAGEMENT LL c
13.
If No please indicate copies which were needed: ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………
No
Crew can understand simple command of English during drills and training and understood their tasks. If No state other “working language”:
Yes
No
Crew able to read and understand circulars and instructions from the office. If No state reasons: ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Yes
No
Existing procedures in the SOM-03 manual and other manuals are too complicated to be understood by masters and his crew. If Yes please provide comments for improvements. ................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................. …………………………… .....................................................................................................................................
Yes
No
Ship personnel can identify and react correctly to any shipboard emergencies and capable of preparing themselves if such situations arise. If No state reasons: .................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ...............................................................................................................................
Yes
No
Key shipboard personnel understood their duties as defined in the SOM-03 section 2.0 If No state reasons: .................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ..............................................................................................................................
Yes
No
Yes
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
14.
15.
16
17.
Form No: SMSR Page 3 of 4
18.
Rev No: 0
Effective Date: 04.04.2015
SOM-03-2
Sufficient time and resources available to carry out the maintenance as scheduled in the PMS.
ALLIANZ MIDDLE EAST SHIP MANAGEMENT LL c
19.
20.
21.
If No state reasons: ........................................................................................................................... ......... ........................................................................................................................................... ..............................................................................................................................
No
PMS had helped to achieve the objectives on the reliability of shipboard machinery and system and reduced breakdowns. If No state reasons: .................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ..............................................................................................................................
Yes
No
Sufficient shore based were given to ensure that LSA and FFA equipment are well maintained. If No state reasons: ................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………
Yes
No
Crews were equipped sufficiently with the proper PPE. If No state reasons: ................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................... ………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………
Yes
No
22.
In what way (in the master opinion) the company can provide masters and other key shipboard personnel on the ISM Code and the Company’s SMS. State opinion: ........................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................... ………………………………………………………………………………........................... .........................................
23.
Any additional Comments or recommendation: ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………………….
One copy of this report is to be filed on board.
…………………………. Signature / Date/Stamp Form No: SMSR Page 4 of 4
Rev No: 0
Effective Date: 04.04.2015
SOM-03-2