Design Of Eccentric Loaded Footing Using Tedds 3e205a
This document was ed by and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this report form. Report 3i3n4
Overview 26281t
& View Design Of Eccentric Loaded Footing Using Tedds as PDF for free.
More details 6y5l6z
- Words: 2,064
- Pages: 7
POAGE
Project
Job Ref.
Section
Sheet no./rev.
1 Calc. by
Date
S
5/13/2016
Chk'd by
Date
App'd by
Date
FOUNDATION ANALYSIS & DESIGN (ACI318) In accordance with ACI318-11 incorporating Errata as of August 8, 2014 Tedds calculation version 3.0.00
FOUNDATION ANALYSIS Length of foundation;
Lx = 10 ft
Width of foundation;
Ly = 5 ft
Foundation area;
A = Lx × Ly = 50 ft2
Depth of foundation;
h = 12 in
Depth of soil over foundation;
hsoil = 18 in
Density of concrete;
γconc = 150.0 lb/ft3
y
x
1
2.279 ksf
2.279 ksf
Column no.1 details Length of column;
lx1 = 18.00 in
Width of column;
ly1 = 24.00 in
position in x-axis;
x1 = 60.00 in
position in y-axis;
y1 = 12.00 in
Soil properties Gross allowable bearing pressure;
qallow_Gross = 2.5 ksf
Density of soil;
γsoil = 120.0 lb/ft3
Angle of internal friction;
φb = 30.0 deg
Design base friction angle;
δbb = 30.0 deg
Coefficient of base friction;
tan(δbb) = 0.577
Dead surcharge load;
FDsur = 50 psf
Self weight;
Fswt = h × γconc = 150 psf
Soil weight;
Fsoil = hsoil × γsoil = 180 psf
Column no.1 loads Dead load in z;
FDz1 = 16.7 kips
Live load in z;
FLz1 = 18.5 kips
Live roof load in z;
FLrz1 = 4.2 kips
POAGE
Project
Job Ref.
Section
Sheet no./rev.
2 Calc. by
Date
S
5/13/2016
Chk'd by
Date
App'd by
Date
Foundation analysis for soil and stability Load combinations per ASCE 7-10 1.0D (0.526) 1.0D + 1.0Lr (0.619) 1.0D + 1.0S (0.526) 1.0D + 1.0R (0.526) 1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75Lr (0.911) 1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75S (0.839) 1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75R (0.839) (1.0 + 0.14 × SDS)D + 0.7E (0.542) (1.0 + 0.10 × SDS)D + 0.75L + 0.75S + 0.525E (0.850) (0.6 - 0.14 × SDS)D + 0.7E (0.299) Combination 6 results: 1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75Lr Forces on foundation Force in z-axis;
Fdz = γD × A × (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) + γD × FDz1 + γL × FLz1 + γLr × FLrz1 = 52.7 kips
Moments on foundation Moment in x-axis, about x is 0;
Mdx = γD × (A × (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) × Lx / 2) + γD × (FDz1 × x1) + γL × (FLz1 × x1) + γLr × (FLrz1 × x1) = 263.4 kip_ft
Moment in y-axis, about y is 0;
Mdy = γD × (A × (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) × Ly / 2) + γD × (FDz1 × y1) + γL × (FLz1 × y1) + γLr × (FLrz1 × y1) = 81.2 kip_ft
Uplift verification Vertical force;
Fdz = 52.675 kips - Foundation is not subject to uplift
Bearing resistance Eccentricity of base reaction Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis;
edx = Mdx / Fdz - Lx / 2 = 0 in
Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis;
edy = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = -11.507 in
Length of bearing in y-axis;
L'yd = min(Ly,3 × (Ly / 2 - abs(edy))) = 55.478 in
Pad base pressures q1 = 2 × Fdz / (3 × Lx × (Ly / 2 + edy)) = 2.279 ksf q2 = 0 ksf q3 = 2 × Fdz / (3 × Lx × (Ly / 2 + edy)) = 2.279 ksf q4 = 0 ksf Minimum base pressure;
qmin = min(q1,q2,q3,q4) = 0 ksf
Maximum base pressure;
qmax = max(q1,q2,q3,q4) = 2.279 ksf
Allowable bearing capacity Allowable bearing capacity;
qallow = qallow_Gross = 2.5 ksf qmax / qallow = 0.911 - Allowable bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure
POAGE
Project
Job Ref.
Section
Sheet no./rev.
3 Calc. by
Date
S
5/13/2016
Chk'd by
Date
App'd by
Date
FOUNDATION DESIGN (ACI318) In accordance with ACI318-11 incorporating Errata as of August 8, 2014 Material details Compressive strength of concrete;
f’c = 3500 psi
Yield strength of reinforcement;
fy = 60000 psi
Cover to reinforcement; Concrete type;
cnom = 3 in Normal weight
Concrete modification factor;
λ = 1.00
Column type;
Concrete
Analysis and design of concrete footing Load combinations per ASCE 7-10 1.4D (0.359) 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr (0.957) 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5S (0.909) 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5R (0.909) 1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6Lr (0.808) 1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6S (0.657) 1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6R (0.657) (1.2 + 0.2 × SDS)D + 1.0L + 0.2S + 1.0E (0.666) (0.9 - 0.2 × SDS)D + 1.0E (0.220) Combination 2 results: 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr Forces on foundation Ultimate force in z-axis;
Fuz = γD × A × (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) + γD × FDz1 + γL × FLz1 + γLr × FLrz1 = 74.5 kips
Moments on foundation Ultimate moment in x-axis, about x is 0;
Mux = γD × (A × (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) × Lx / 2) + γD × (FDz1 × x1) + γL × (FLz1 × x1) + γLr × (FLrz1 × x1) = 372.4 kip_ft
Ultimate moment in y-axis, about y is 0;
Muy = γD × (A × (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) × Ly / 2) + γD × (FDz1 × y1) + γL × (FLz1 × y1) + γLr × (FLrz1 × y1) = 108.7 kip_ft
Eccentricity of base reaction Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis;
eux = Mux / Fuz - Lx / 2 = 0 in
Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis;
euy = Muy / Fuz - Ly / 2 = -12.489 in
Length of bearing in y-axis;
L'yu = min(Ly,3 × (Ly / 2 - abs(euy))) = 52.532 in
Pad base pressures qu1 = 2 × Fuz / (3 × Lx × (Ly / 2 + euy)) = 3.402 ksf qu2 = 0 ksf qu3 = 2 × Fuz / (3 × Lx × (Ly / 2 + euy)) = 3.402 ksf qu4 = 0 ksf Minimum ultimate base pressure;
qumin = min(qu1,qu2,qu3,qu4) = 0 ksf
Maximum ultimate base pressure;
qumax = max(qu1,qu2,qu3,qu4) = 3.402 ksf
POAGE
Project
Job Ref.
Section
Sheet no./rev.
4 Calc. by
Date
S
5/13/2016
Chk'd by
Date
App'd by
Shear diagram, x axis Shear (kips)
22.3
31.1
0 0
1
2 -22.3
-31.1
Moment diagram, x axis Moment (kip_ft)
0
0 1
2
56.2
77.8
Shear diagram, y axis Shear (kips)
25.6 4.2 4.2
-0.7 0
1
2
-26.1
Moment diagram, y axis Moment (kip_ft)
-6 0 0.0 1
2
13.4
Moment design, x direction, positive moment Ultimate bending moment; Tension reinforcement provided;
Mu.x.max = 56.238 kip_ft 5 No.5 bottom bars (13.3 in c/c)
Date
POAGE
Project
Job Ref.
Section
Sheet no./rev.
5 Calc. by
Date
S
5/13/2016
Chk'd by
Date
Area of tension reinforcement provided;
Asx.bot.prov = 1.55 in2
Minimum area of reinforcement (10.5.4);
As.min = 0.0018 × Ly × h = 1.296 in2
App'd by
Date
- Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum smax = min(3 × h, 18 in) = 18 in
Maximum spacing of reinforcement (10.5.4);
- Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing Depth to tension reinforcement;
d = h - cnom - φx.bot / 2 = 8.688 in
Depth of compression block;
a = Asx.bot.prov × fy / (0.85 × f'c × Ly) = 0.521 in
Neutral axis factor;
β1 = 0.85
Depth to neutral axis;
c = a / β1 = 0.613 in
Strain in tensile reinforcement (10.3.5);
εt = 0.003 × d / c - 0.003 = 0.03952 - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004
Nominal moment capacity;
Mn = Asx.bot.prov × fy × (d - a / 2) = 65.309 kip_ft
Flexural strength reduction factor;
φf = min(max(0.65 + (εt - 0.002) × (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) = 0.900
Design moment capacity;
φMn = φf × Mn = 58.778 kip_ft Mu.x.max / φMn = 0.957 - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
One-way shear design, x direction Ultimate shear force;
Vu.x = 22.28 kips
Depth to reinforcement;
dv = h - cnom - φy.bot - φx.bot / 2 = 8.062 in
Shear strength reduction factor;
φv = 0.75
Nominal shear capacity (Eq. 11-3);
Vn = 2 × λ × √(f'c × 1 psi) × Ly × dv = 57.238 kips φVn = φv × Vn = 42.929 kips
Design shear capacity;
Vu.x / φVn = 0.519 - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load Footing geometry factor (15.4.4.2);
βf = Lx / Ly = 2.000
Area of reinf. req. for uniform distribution (CRSI);
Asreq = (Mu.y.max / (φf × fy × (d - a / 2))) × 2 × βf / (βf + 1) = 0.000 in2 - Reinforcement can be distributed uniformly
Moment design, y direction, negative moment Ultimate bending moment; Tension reinforcement provided;
Mu.y.min = -5.957 kip_ft 9 No.5 top bars (14.1 in c/c)
Area of tension reinforcement provided;
Asy.top.prov = 2.79 in2
Minimum area of reinforcement (10.5.4);
As.min = 0.0018 × Lx × h = 2.592 in2
Maximum spacing of reinforcement (10.5.4);
smax = min(3 × h, 18 in) = 18 in
- Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing Depth to tension reinforcement;
d = h - cnom - φy.top / 2 = 8.688 in
Depth of compression block;
a = Asy.top.prov × fy / (0.85 × f'c × Lx) = 0.469 in
Neutral axis factor;
β1 = 0.85
Depth to neutral axis;
c = a / β1 = 0.552 in
Strain in tensile reinforcement (10.3.5);
εt = 0.003 × d / c - 0.003 = 0.04424 - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004
Nominal moment capacity;
Mn = Asy.top.prov × fy × (d - a / 2) = 117.92 kip_ft
Flexural strength reduction factor;
φf = min(max(0.65 + (εt - 0.002) × (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) = 0.900
POAGE
Project
Job Ref.
Section
Sheet no./rev.
6 Calc. by
Date
S
5/13/2016
Design moment capacity;
Chk'd by
Date
App'd by
Date
φMn = φf × Mn = 106.128 kip_ft abs(Mu.y.min) / φMn = 0.056 - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
One-way shear design, y direction Ultimate shear force;
Vu.y = 4.176 kips
Depth to reinforcement;
dv = min(h - cnom - φy.bot / 2,h - cnom - φy.top / 2) = 8.688 in
Shear strength reduction factor;
φv = 0.75
Nominal shear capacity (Eq. 11-3);
Vn = 2 × λ × √(f'c × 1 psi) × Lx × dv = 123.35 kips
Design shear capacity;
φVn = φv × Vn = 92.513 kips Vu.y / φVn = 0.045 - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load
Two-way shear design at column 1 Depth to reinforcement;
dv2 = 8.375 in
Shear perimeter length (11.11.1.2);
lxp = 26.375 in
Shear perimeter width (11.11.1.2);
lyp = 28.188 in
Shear perimeter (11.11.1.2);
bo = 2 × lyp + lxp = 82.750 in
Shear area;
Ap = lxp × lyp = 743.445 in2
Surcharge loaded area;
Asur = Ap - lx1 × ly1 = 311.445 in2
Ultimate bearing pressure at center of shear area; qup.avg = 2.490 ksf Ultimate shear load;
Fup = γD × FDz1 + γL × FLz1 + γLr × FLrz1 + γD × Ap × Fswt + γD × Asur × Fsoil + γD × Asur × FDsur - qup.avg × Ap = 40.347 kips
Ultimate shear stress from vertical load;
vug = max(Fup / (bo × d),0 psi) = 56.124 psi
Column geometry factor (11.11.2.1);
β = ly1 / lx1 = 1.33
Column location factor (11.11.2.1);
αs =30
Concrete shear strength (11.11.2.1);
va = (2 + 4 / β) × λ × √(f'c × 1 psi) = 295.804 psi vb = (αs × dv2 / bo + 2) × λ × √(f'c × 1 psi) = 297.949 psi vc = 4 × λ × √(f'c × 1 psi) = 236.643 psi v = min(va,vb,vc) = 236.643 psi
Shear strength reduction factor;
φv = 0.75
Nominal shear stress capacity (Eq. 11-2);
vn = v = 236.643 psi
Design shear stress capacity (Eq. 11-1);
φvn = φv × vn = 177.482 psi vug / φvn = 0.316 - Design shear stress capacity exceeds ultimate shear stress load
POAGE
Project
Job Ref.
Section
Sheet no./rev.
7 Calc. by
Date
S
5/13/2016
Chk'd by
Date
App'd by
6 No.5 bottom bars (22.6 in c/c) 9 No.5 top bars (14.1 in c/c)
1 5 No.5 bottom bars (13.3 in c/c)
Date
Project
Job Ref.
Section
Sheet no./rev.
1 Calc. by
Date
S
5/13/2016
Chk'd by
Date
App'd by
Date
FOUNDATION ANALYSIS & DESIGN (ACI318) In accordance with ACI318-11 incorporating Errata as of August 8, 2014 Tedds calculation version 3.0.00
FOUNDATION ANALYSIS Length of foundation;
Lx = 10 ft
Width of foundation;
Ly = 5 ft
Foundation area;
A = Lx × Ly = 50 ft2
Depth of foundation;
h = 12 in
Depth of soil over foundation;
hsoil = 18 in
Density of concrete;
γconc = 150.0 lb/ft3
y
x
1
2.279 ksf
2.279 ksf
Column no.1 details Length of column;
lx1 = 18.00 in
Width of column;
ly1 = 24.00 in
position in x-axis;
x1 = 60.00 in
position in y-axis;
y1 = 12.00 in
Soil properties Gross allowable bearing pressure;
qallow_Gross = 2.5 ksf
Density of soil;
γsoil = 120.0 lb/ft3
Angle of internal friction;
φb = 30.0 deg
Design base friction angle;
δbb = 30.0 deg
Coefficient of base friction;
tan(δbb) = 0.577
Dead surcharge load;
FDsur = 50 psf
Self weight;
Fswt = h × γconc = 150 psf
Soil weight;
Fsoil = hsoil × γsoil = 180 psf
Column no.1 loads Dead load in z;
FDz1 = 16.7 kips
Live load in z;
FLz1 = 18.5 kips
Live roof load in z;
FLrz1 = 4.2 kips
POAGE
Project
Job Ref.
Section
Sheet no./rev.
2 Calc. by
Date
S
5/13/2016
Chk'd by
Date
App'd by
Date
Foundation analysis for soil and stability Load combinations per ASCE 7-10 1.0D (0.526) 1.0D + 1.0Lr (0.619) 1.0D + 1.0S (0.526) 1.0D + 1.0R (0.526) 1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75Lr (0.911) 1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75S (0.839) 1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75R (0.839) (1.0 + 0.14 × SDS)D + 0.7E (0.542) (1.0 + 0.10 × SDS)D + 0.75L + 0.75S + 0.525E (0.850) (0.6 - 0.14 × SDS)D + 0.7E (0.299) Combination 6 results: 1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75Lr Forces on foundation Force in z-axis;
Fdz = γD × A × (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) + γD × FDz1 + γL × FLz1 + γLr × FLrz1 = 52.7 kips
Moments on foundation Moment in x-axis, about x is 0;
Mdx = γD × (A × (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) × Lx / 2) + γD × (FDz1 × x1) + γL × (FLz1 × x1) + γLr × (FLrz1 × x1) = 263.4 kip_ft
Moment in y-axis, about y is 0;
Mdy = γD × (A × (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) × Ly / 2) + γD × (FDz1 × y1) + γL × (FLz1 × y1) + γLr × (FLrz1 × y1) = 81.2 kip_ft
Uplift verification Vertical force;
Fdz = 52.675 kips - Foundation is not subject to uplift
Bearing resistance Eccentricity of base reaction Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis;
edx = Mdx / Fdz - Lx / 2 = 0 in
Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis;
edy = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = -11.507 in
Length of bearing in y-axis;
L'yd = min(Ly,3 × (Ly / 2 - abs(edy))) = 55.478 in
Pad base pressures q1 = 2 × Fdz / (3 × Lx × (Ly / 2 + edy)) = 2.279 ksf q2 = 0 ksf q3 = 2 × Fdz / (3 × Lx × (Ly / 2 + edy)) = 2.279 ksf q4 = 0 ksf Minimum base pressure;
qmin = min(q1,q2,q3,q4) = 0 ksf
Maximum base pressure;
qmax = max(q1,q2,q3,q4) = 2.279 ksf
Allowable bearing capacity Allowable bearing capacity;
qallow = qallow_Gross = 2.5 ksf qmax / qallow = 0.911 - Allowable bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure
POAGE
Project
Job Ref.
Section
Sheet no./rev.
3 Calc. by
Date
S
5/13/2016
Chk'd by
Date
App'd by
Date
FOUNDATION DESIGN (ACI318) In accordance with ACI318-11 incorporating Errata as of August 8, 2014 Material details Compressive strength of concrete;
f’c = 3500 psi
Yield strength of reinforcement;
fy = 60000 psi
Cover to reinforcement; Concrete type;
cnom = 3 in Normal weight
Concrete modification factor;
λ = 1.00
Column type;
Concrete
Analysis and design of concrete footing Load combinations per ASCE 7-10 1.4D (0.359) 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr (0.957) 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5S (0.909) 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5R (0.909) 1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6Lr (0.808) 1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6S (0.657) 1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6R (0.657) (1.2 + 0.2 × SDS)D + 1.0L + 0.2S + 1.0E (0.666) (0.9 - 0.2 × SDS)D + 1.0E (0.220) Combination 2 results: 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr Forces on foundation Ultimate force in z-axis;
Fuz = γD × A × (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) + γD × FDz1 + γL × FLz1 + γLr × FLrz1 = 74.5 kips
Moments on foundation Ultimate moment in x-axis, about x is 0;
Mux = γD × (A × (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) × Lx / 2) + γD × (FDz1 × x1) + γL × (FLz1 × x1) + γLr × (FLrz1 × x1) = 372.4 kip_ft
Ultimate moment in y-axis, about y is 0;
Muy = γD × (A × (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) × Ly / 2) + γD × (FDz1 × y1) + γL × (FLz1 × y1) + γLr × (FLrz1 × y1) = 108.7 kip_ft
Eccentricity of base reaction Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis;
eux = Mux / Fuz - Lx / 2 = 0 in
Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis;
euy = Muy / Fuz - Ly / 2 = -12.489 in
Length of bearing in y-axis;
L'yu = min(Ly,3 × (Ly / 2 - abs(euy))) = 52.532 in
Pad base pressures qu1 = 2 × Fuz / (3 × Lx × (Ly / 2 + euy)) = 3.402 ksf qu2 = 0 ksf qu3 = 2 × Fuz / (3 × Lx × (Ly / 2 + euy)) = 3.402 ksf qu4 = 0 ksf Minimum ultimate base pressure;
qumin = min(qu1,qu2,qu3,qu4) = 0 ksf
Maximum ultimate base pressure;
qumax = max(qu1,qu2,qu3,qu4) = 3.402 ksf
POAGE
Project
Job Ref.
Section
Sheet no./rev.
4 Calc. by
Date
S
5/13/2016
Chk'd by
Date
App'd by
Shear diagram, x axis Shear (kips)
22.3
31.1
0 0
1
2 -22.3
-31.1
Moment diagram, x axis Moment (kip_ft)
0
0 1
2
56.2
77.8
Shear diagram, y axis Shear (kips)
25.6 4.2 4.2
-0.7 0
1
2
-26.1
Moment diagram, y axis Moment (kip_ft)
-6 0 0.0 1
2
13.4
Moment design, x direction, positive moment Ultimate bending moment; Tension reinforcement provided;
Mu.x.max = 56.238 kip_ft 5 No.5 bottom bars (13.3 in c/c)
Date
POAGE
Project
Job Ref.
Section
Sheet no./rev.
5 Calc. by
Date
S
5/13/2016
Chk'd by
Date
Area of tension reinforcement provided;
Asx.bot.prov = 1.55 in2
Minimum area of reinforcement (10.5.4);
As.min = 0.0018 × Ly × h = 1.296 in2
App'd by
Date
- Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum smax = min(3 × h, 18 in) = 18 in
Maximum spacing of reinforcement (10.5.4);
- Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing Depth to tension reinforcement;
d = h - cnom - φx.bot / 2 = 8.688 in
Depth of compression block;
a = Asx.bot.prov × fy / (0.85 × f'c × Ly) = 0.521 in
Neutral axis factor;
β1 = 0.85
Depth to neutral axis;
c = a / β1 = 0.613 in
Strain in tensile reinforcement (10.3.5);
εt = 0.003 × d / c - 0.003 = 0.03952 - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004
Nominal moment capacity;
Mn = Asx.bot.prov × fy × (d - a / 2) = 65.309 kip_ft
Flexural strength reduction factor;
φf = min(max(0.65 + (εt - 0.002) × (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) = 0.900
Design moment capacity;
φMn = φf × Mn = 58.778 kip_ft Mu.x.max / φMn = 0.957 - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
One-way shear design, x direction Ultimate shear force;
Vu.x = 22.28 kips
Depth to reinforcement;
dv = h - cnom - φy.bot - φx.bot / 2 = 8.062 in
Shear strength reduction factor;
φv = 0.75
Nominal shear capacity (Eq. 11-3);
Vn = 2 × λ × √(f'c × 1 psi) × Ly × dv = 57.238 kips φVn = φv × Vn = 42.929 kips
Design shear capacity;
Vu.x / φVn = 0.519 - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load Footing geometry factor (15.4.4.2);
βf = Lx / Ly = 2.000
Area of reinf. req. for uniform distribution (CRSI);
Asreq = (Mu.y.max / (φf × fy × (d - a / 2))) × 2 × βf / (βf + 1) = 0.000 in2 - Reinforcement can be distributed uniformly
Moment design, y direction, negative moment Ultimate bending moment; Tension reinforcement provided;
Mu.y.min = -5.957 kip_ft 9 No.5 top bars (14.1 in c/c)
Area of tension reinforcement provided;
Asy.top.prov = 2.79 in2
Minimum area of reinforcement (10.5.4);
As.min = 0.0018 × Lx × h = 2.592 in2
Maximum spacing of reinforcement (10.5.4);
smax = min(3 × h, 18 in) = 18 in
- Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing Depth to tension reinforcement;
d = h - cnom - φy.top / 2 = 8.688 in
Depth of compression block;
a = Asy.top.prov × fy / (0.85 × f'c × Lx) = 0.469 in
Neutral axis factor;
β1 = 0.85
Depth to neutral axis;
c = a / β1 = 0.552 in
Strain in tensile reinforcement (10.3.5);
εt = 0.003 × d / c - 0.003 = 0.04424 - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004
Nominal moment capacity;
Mn = Asy.top.prov × fy × (d - a / 2) = 117.92 kip_ft
Flexural strength reduction factor;
φf = min(max(0.65 + (εt - 0.002) × (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) = 0.900
POAGE
Project
Job Ref.
Section
Sheet no./rev.
6 Calc. by
Date
S
5/13/2016
Design moment capacity;
Chk'd by
Date
App'd by
Date
φMn = φf × Mn = 106.128 kip_ft abs(Mu.y.min) / φMn = 0.056 - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
One-way shear design, y direction Ultimate shear force;
Vu.y = 4.176 kips
Depth to reinforcement;
dv = min(h - cnom - φy.bot / 2,h - cnom - φy.top / 2) = 8.688 in
Shear strength reduction factor;
φv = 0.75
Nominal shear capacity (Eq. 11-3);
Vn = 2 × λ × √(f'c × 1 psi) × Lx × dv = 123.35 kips
Design shear capacity;
φVn = φv × Vn = 92.513 kips Vu.y / φVn = 0.045 - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load
Two-way shear design at column 1 Depth to reinforcement;
dv2 = 8.375 in
Shear perimeter length (11.11.1.2);
lxp = 26.375 in
Shear perimeter width (11.11.1.2);
lyp = 28.188 in
Shear perimeter (11.11.1.2);
bo = 2 × lyp + lxp = 82.750 in
Shear area;
Ap = lxp × lyp = 743.445 in2
Surcharge loaded area;
Asur = Ap - lx1 × ly1 = 311.445 in2
Ultimate bearing pressure at center of shear area; qup.avg = 2.490 ksf Ultimate shear load;
Fup = γD × FDz1 + γL × FLz1 + γLr × FLrz1 + γD × Ap × Fswt + γD × Asur × Fsoil + γD × Asur × FDsur - qup.avg × Ap = 40.347 kips
Ultimate shear stress from vertical load;
vug = max(Fup / (bo × d),0 psi) = 56.124 psi
Column geometry factor (11.11.2.1);
β = ly1 / lx1 = 1.33
Column location factor (11.11.2.1);
αs =30
Concrete shear strength (11.11.2.1);
va = (2 + 4 / β) × λ × √(f'c × 1 psi) = 295.804 psi vb = (αs × dv2 / bo + 2) × λ × √(f'c × 1 psi) = 297.949 psi vc = 4 × λ × √(f'c × 1 psi) = 236.643 psi v = min(va,vb,vc) = 236.643 psi
Shear strength reduction factor;
φv = 0.75
Nominal shear stress capacity (Eq. 11-2);
vn = v = 236.643 psi
Design shear stress capacity (Eq. 11-1);
φvn = φv × vn = 177.482 psi vug / φvn = 0.316 - Design shear stress capacity exceeds ultimate shear stress load
POAGE
Project
Job Ref.
Section
Sheet no./rev.
7 Calc. by
Date
S
5/13/2016
Chk'd by
Date
App'd by
6 No.5 bottom bars (22.6 in c/c) 9 No.5 top bars (14.1 in c/c)
1 5 No.5 bottom bars (13.3 in c/c)
Date
Related Documents 3h463d
Design Of Eccentric Loaded Footing Using Tedds 3e205a
December 2019 57
Eccentric Footing Design Example 5y4i49
October 2019 290
Eccentric Footing 6v1e1k
February 2022 0
Eccentric Footing By Ws.pdf 61z27
April 2022 0
Design Of Cantilever Footing 4d3d1t
November 2019 53
Design Of Square Footing 26r1q
July 2022 0More Documents from "Roberto Catalani" 4b42u
Typical Elevator Shaft Structural Plan 47575t
December 2019 27
Design Of Eccentric Loaded Footing Using Tedds 3e205a
December 2019 57
Idalberto Chiavenato - istracion De Rrhh (scaneado) 4l539
January 2023 0
Guia Para Hacer La Denuncia De Violencia Familiar 4s1k5y
May 2020 5
Recurso Em Sentido Estrito - Modelo 6fj1n
November 2019 52