Scribbles Of A Lunatic Mind_ People Vs. Taneo [58 Phil 5d3b16
This document was ed by and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this report form. Report 3i3n4
Overview 26281t
& View Scribbles Of A Lunatic Mind_ People Vs. Taneo [58 Phil as PDF for free.
More details 6y5l6z
- Words: 1,047
- Pages: 2
10/14/2015
Scribbles of a Lunatic Mind: People vs. Taneo [58 Phil. 255 (1933)]
Scribbles of a Lunatic Mind I'M A SCHIZOPHRENIC! I'M HAPPY! I'M PROUD TO BE ONE!
HOME
Home
POSTS RSS
Criminal Law
COMMENTS RSS
enter your keywords here...
EDIT
Share
People vs. Taneo [58 Phil. 255 (1933)]
People vs. Taneo [58 Phil. 255 (1933)]
On This Blog F O L L O W BY EMAIL
Post under case digests, Criminal Law at Wednesday, February 29, 2012 Posted by Schizophrenic Mind
Facts: Potenciano Taneo and his wife lived in his parent's house in Dolores, Ormoc. On January 16, 1932, a fiesta was being celebrated in the said barrio and guests were entertained in the house, among them were Fred Tanner and Luis Malinao. Early that afternoon, Potenciano went to sleep and while sleeping, he suddenly got up, left the room bolo in hand and, upon meeting his wife who tried to stop him, wounded her in the abdomen. He also attacked Fred and Luis and tried to attack his father, after which, he wounded himself. Potenciano's wife, who was 7 months pregnant at that time, died five days later as a result of the wound. The trial court found Potenciano guilty of parricide and was sentenced to reclusion perpetua. It appears from the evidence that the day before the commission of the crime, the defendant had a quarrel over a glass of "tuba" with Collantes and Abadilla, who invited him to come down and fight. When he was about to go down, he was stopped by his wife and his mother. On the day of the commission of the crime, it was noted that the defendant was sad and weak, had a severe stomachache that's why he went to bed in the early afternoon. The defendant stated that when he fell asleep, he dreamed that Collantes was trying to stab him with a bolo while Abadila held his feet. That's why he got up and it seemed to him that his enemies were inviting him to come down; he armed himself with a bolo and left the room. At the door, he met his wife who seemed to say to him that she was wounded. Then, he fancied seeing his wife really wounded and in desperation wounded himself. As his enemies seemed to multiply around him, he attacked everybody that came his way.
Email address... Submit
Subscribe in a reader
CAT EG O RIES bar exam questionnaire (8) case digests (612) Civil Law (123)
NetworkedBlogs Commercial Law (89)
Followers (9)
Criminal Law (102) labor law (95) Legal Ethics (89) MCQ (28) personal (6) Political Law (163) promo/discounts/freebies (56) Psychiatry (5) Remedial Law (112)
Follow this blog
Taxation (85)
Display Pagerank
Issue: Whether or not defendant acted while in a dream.
villarama doctrines (103)
Held: Yes. The defendant acted while in a dream & his acts, therefore, weren’t voluntary in the sense of entailing criminal liability. The apparent lack of motive for committing a criminal act does not necessarily mean that there are none, but that simply they are not known to us. Although an extreme moral perversion may lead a man to commit a crime without a real motive but just for the sake of committing it. In the case at hand, the court found not only lack of motives for the defendant to voluntarily commit the acts complained of (read: he loved his wife dearly, he tried to attack his father in whose house the lived and the guests whom he invited), but also motives for not committing the acts.
There was an error in this gadget
603,618
RECO MMENDED READS
Dr. Serafica, an expert witness in the case, stated that considering the circumstances of the case, the defendant acted while in a dream, under the influence of a hallucination and not in his right mind.
bethere2day bloglinksexchange BLOGPH.com
The wife's wound may have been inflicted accidentally. The defendant did not dream that he was assaulting his wife, but that he was defending himself from his enemies.
Maruism NURSINGnle Philippine
Bli
Fu
nk
rl
Case
Digests
Databank Scire Licet The Digester
0 CO MMENT S: O N "PEO PL E VS. T ANEO [ 58 PHIL . 255 ( 1933) ] "
Uberdigests
ARCHIVE
PO ST A CO MMENT
http://coffeeafficionado.blogspot.com/2012/02/peoplevstaneo58phil2551933.html
Archive
1/2
10/14/2015
Scribbles of a Lunatic Mind: People vs. Taneo [58 Phil. 255 (1933)]
Newer Post
Home
Older Post
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom) DISCL AIMER
PO PUL AR PO ST S
All contents provided on this blog are for informational/educational purposes only. Coffeeafficionado makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not also be liable for any errors or omissions on the information provided nor for the availability of this information.
BANAT vs. COMELEC , GR 17927 [ April 21, 2009 ] Facts: Barangay Association for National Advancement and Transparency (BANAT) filed before the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) a petitio... Philippine Blooming Mills Employees Organization vs. PBM, 51 SCRA 189 Facts: Philippine Blooming Employees Organization (PBMEO) decided to stage a mass demonstration in front of Malacañang to express their gri... Abakada Guro Party List, et al vs Exec. Sec. Ermita Facts: On May 24, 2005, the President signed into law Republic Act 9337 or the VAT Reform Act. Before the law took effect on July 1, 2005,... Calalang vs. Williams, 70 Phil 726 Facts: Pursuant to the power delegated to it by the Legislature, the Director of Public Works promulgated rules and regulations pertainin... Garcia vs. Mata Facts: Garcia was a reserve officer on active duty who was reversed to inactive status. He filed an action for mandamus to compel the DND ...
Coffeeafficionado claims no credit for any image/video/ads featured on this blog. They are all copyrighted to its site owners. If you own rights to any of the images/videos featured on this blog, and do not wish them to appear on this site, Coffeeafficionado thru email and they will be immediately removed.
F O L L O WERS
Copyright 2009. Scribbles of a Lunatic Mind WPBoxedTech Theme Design by Technology Tricks for Health Coupons. Bloggerized by Free Blogger Template Sponsored by Graphic ZONe and Technology Info
http://coffeeafficionado.blogspot.com/2012/02/peoplevstaneo58phil2551933.html
2/2
Scribbles of a Lunatic Mind: People vs. Taneo [58 Phil. 255 (1933)]
Scribbles of a Lunatic Mind I'M A SCHIZOPHRENIC! I'M HAPPY! I'M PROUD TO BE ONE!
HOME
Home
POSTS RSS
Criminal Law
COMMENTS RSS
enter your keywords here...
EDIT
Share
People vs. Taneo [58 Phil. 255 (1933)]
People vs. Taneo [58 Phil. 255 (1933)]
On This Blog F O L L O W BY EMAIL
Post under case digests, Criminal Law at Wednesday, February 29, 2012 Posted by Schizophrenic Mind
Facts: Potenciano Taneo and his wife lived in his parent's house in Dolores, Ormoc. On January 16, 1932, a fiesta was being celebrated in the said barrio and guests were entertained in the house, among them were Fred Tanner and Luis Malinao. Early that afternoon, Potenciano went to sleep and while sleeping, he suddenly got up, left the room bolo in hand and, upon meeting his wife who tried to stop him, wounded her in the abdomen. He also attacked Fred and Luis and tried to attack his father, after which, he wounded himself. Potenciano's wife, who was 7 months pregnant at that time, died five days later as a result of the wound. The trial court found Potenciano guilty of parricide and was sentenced to reclusion perpetua. It appears from the evidence that the day before the commission of the crime, the defendant had a quarrel over a glass of "tuba" with Collantes and Abadilla, who invited him to come down and fight. When he was about to go down, he was stopped by his wife and his mother. On the day of the commission of the crime, it was noted that the defendant was sad and weak, had a severe stomachache that's why he went to bed in the early afternoon. The defendant stated that when he fell asleep, he dreamed that Collantes was trying to stab him with a bolo while Abadila held his feet. That's why he got up and it seemed to him that his enemies were inviting him to come down; he armed himself with a bolo and left the room. At the door, he met his wife who seemed to say to him that she was wounded. Then, he fancied seeing his wife really wounded and in desperation wounded himself. As his enemies seemed to multiply around him, he attacked everybody that came his way.
Email address... Submit
Subscribe in a reader
CAT EG O RIES bar exam questionnaire (8) case digests (612) Civil Law (123)
NetworkedBlogs Commercial Law (89)
Followers (9)
Criminal Law (102) labor law (95) Legal Ethics (89) MCQ (28) personal (6) Political Law (163) promo/discounts/freebies (56) Psychiatry (5) Remedial Law (112)
Follow this blog
Taxation (85)
Display Pagerank
Issue: Whether or not defendant acted while in a dream.
villarama doctrines (103)
Held: Yes. The defendant acted while in a dream & his acts, therefore, weren’t voluntary in the sense of entailing criminal liability. The apparent lack of motive for committing a criminal act does not necessarily mean that there are none, but that simply they are not known to us. Although an extreme moral perversion may lead a man to commit a crime without a real motive but just for the sake of committing it. In the case at hand, the court found not only lack of motives for the defendant to voluntarily commit the acts complained of (read: he loved his wife dearly, he tried to attack his father in whose house the lived and the guests whom he invited), but also motives for not committing the acts.
There was an error in this gadget
603,618
RECO MMENDED READS
Dr. Serafica, an expert witness in the case, stated that considering the circumstances of the case, the defendant acted while in a dream, under the influence of a hallucination and not in his right mind.
bethere2day bloglinksexchange BLOGPH.com
The wife's wound may have been inflicted accidentally. The defendant did not dream that he was assaulting his wife, but that he was defending himself from his enemies.
Maruism NURSINGnle Philippine
Bli
Fu
nk
rl
Case
Digests
Databank Scire Licet The Digester
0 CO MMENT S: O N "PEO PL E VS. T ANEO [ 58 PHIL . 255 ( 1933) ] "
Uberdigests
ARCHIVE
PO ST A CO MMENT
http://coffeeafficionado.blogspot.com/2012/02/peoplevstaneo58phil2551933.html
Archive
1/2
10/14/2015
Scribbles of a Lunatic Mind: People vs. Taneo [58 Phil. 255 (1933)]
Newer Post
Home
Older Post
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom) DISCL AIMER
PO PUL AR PO ST S
All contents provided on this blog are for informational/educational purposes only. Coffeeafficionado makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not also be liable for any errors or omissions on the information provided nor for the availability of this information.
BANAT vs. COMELEC , GR 17927 [ April 21, 2009 ] Facts: Barangay Association for National Advancement and Transparency (BANAT) filed before the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) a petitio... Philippine Blooming Mills Employees Organization vs. PBM, 51 SCRA 189 Facts: Philippine Blooming Employees Organization (PBMEO) decided to stage a mass demonstration in front of Malacañang to express their gri... Abakada Guro Party List, et al vs Exec. Sec. Ermita Facts: On May 24, 2005, the President signed into law Republic Act 9337 or the VAT Reform Act. Before the law took effect on July 1, 2005,... Calalang vs. Williams, 70 Phil 726 Facts: Pursuant to the power delegated to it by the Legislature, the Director of Public Works promulgated rules and regulations pertainin... Garcia vs. Mata Facts: Garcia was a reserve officer on active duty who was reversed to inactive status. He filed an action for mandamus to compel the DND ...
Coffeeafficionado claims no credit for any image/video/ads featured on this blog. They are all copyrighted to its site owners. If you own rights to any of the images/videos featured on this blog, and do not wish them to appear on this site, Coffeeafficionado thru email and they will be immediately removed.
F O L L O WERS
Copyright 2009. Scribbles of a Lunatic Mind WPBoxedTech Theme Design by Technology Tricks for Health Coupons. Bloggerized by Free Blogger Template Sponsored by Graphic ZONe and Technology Info
http://coffeeafficionado.blogspot.com/2012/02/peoplevstaneo58phil2551933.html
2/2
Related Documents 3h463d
Scribbles Of A Lunatic Mind_ People Vs. Taneo [58 Phil 5d3b16
July 2020 0
People Vs j5w6x
April 2020 32
People Vs Cabral 693x37
April 2020 18
People Vs Yabut 2s281t
November 2020 0
Bernardo Vs. People 3475
April 2020 23
21.capili Vs. People 174n2x
April 2020 29More Documents from "Real Tabernero" 7p12
Scribbles Of A Lunatic Mind_ People Vs. Taneo [58 Phil 5d3b16
July 2020 0
R.a 2260 5jw65
November 2021 0
Seminario Maquinas Rotativas 2017.pdf 47343r
April 2020 13
Seminario Mantenimiento Predictivo En Transformadores De Potencia 1wm4k
April 2020 26
Seminario Transformadores De Potencia 2b4z6e
April 2020 20