UNDERSTANDING THE SELF
DEFINING THE SELF: PERSONAL & D E V E LO P M E N TA L PERSPECTIVES ON SELF AND IDENTITY CHAPTER 1
THE SELF FROM VARIOUS PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES LESSON 1
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
AT THE END OF THIS LESSON, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO: • Explain why it is essential to understand the self; • Describe and discuss the different notions of the self from the points-of-view of the various philosophers across time and place; • Compare and contrast how the self has been represented in different philosophical schools; and • Examine one’s self against the different views of self that were discussed in class
Self-concept
W TS H IHE L S A E F T
Selfknowledge
SELF Social Self
Selfesteem
LET US NOW TAKE A LOOK AT HOW PHILOSOPHERS ANSWERED THE QUESTION, WHO AM I?
SOCRATES (469-399 BCE) • The Market Philosopher • There is soul first before man’s body. Man first exists in the realm of ideas and exists as a soul or pure mind Every man is composed of body and soul Person is dualistic • When man came to the material world, he forgot the ideas that he knew, hence he became ignorant. Ignorance causes problem to man • Solution: Dialectic method/Socratic method
• Socrates’ student • In addition to what his master (Socrates) earlier espoused (man is dual nature of body and soul), he added that there are three components of the
soul • 3 components of the soul:
(Based in his magnum opus, “The Republic”) RATIONAL SOUL (forged by reason) SPIRITED SOUL (charge of
PLATO (427-347 BCE)
ST. AUGUSTINE (354-430) • He agree that man is of a bifurcated nature • The body is bound to die on earth and the soul is to anticipate living eternally in the realm of spiritual bliss in communication with God • The goal of every human person is to
attain the communion and bliss with the Divine by living his life on earth in virtue
• The most eminent 13th century scholar and stalwart of the medieval philosophy • Man is composed of two parts: MATTER or HYLE (common stuff that makes up everything in the universe) FORM or MORPHE (essence of a substance or thing) • The soul is what animates the body; it is what makes us humans
ST. THOMAS AQUINAS (1225-1274)
RENE DESCARTES (1596-1650) • Father of Modern Philosophy • Brilliant mathematician (Cartesian Geometry) • For him, there is so much that we should doubt • The essence of man is in being a purely thinking being. Thus,
I think, therefore; I am or also known as Cogito (Cogito ergo sum) • He conceived of the human person as having two distinct entities: COGITO or MIND (the thing that thinks) EXTENZA or BODY (extension of the mind) • BODY is nothing else but a machine that is attached to the mind • MIND or THINKING THING is a thing that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, imagines and perceives
ICE BREAKER
JOHN LOCKE • The self is not locked in mind, body and soul only • Memory is part of the definition of the self • Memory Theory (we are the same person as we were in the past for as long as we can something from that past)
(1632-1704)
DAVID HUME (1711-1776) • Scottish philosopher • Empiricism (school of thought that espouses the idea that knowledge can only be possible if it is sensed and experienced.
• Men can only attain knowledge by experiencing • The mind is divided into two categories: Impressions
and Ideas IMPRESSIONS (basic objects of our experience or sensation; products of our direct experience) IDEAS (copies of impressions) • Self is a bundle or collection of different perceptions
• There is necessarily a mind that organizes the impressions that men get from the external world. Built in our minds are the apparatuses of
the mind
• Without the self, one cannot organize the different impressions that one gets in relation to his own existence • Also, self is the seat of knowledge acquisition for all human persons
IMMANUEL KANT (1724-1804)
SIGMUND FREUD (1856-1939) • Man is a combination of his biological structure and the influence of his socio-cultural environment • He devised a tripartite division of man- id, ego,
superego • Id represents the biological structure, superego represents the socio-cultural environment • The two are at battles against each other and whoever wins between them is manifested in the ego. The ego being the self
solves the mind-body dichotomy • For him, what truly matters is the behavior that a person manifests in his day-to-day life • Self is not an entity one can • He
locate and analyze but simply the convenient name that people use to refer to all the behaviors that people make
GILBERT RYLE (1900-1976)
PAUL CHURCHLAND (B. 1942) • Eliminative Materialism (the self is the brain)
• The term mind, moods, emotions, actions, and consciousness are deeply affected by the state of the brain • He proposes a new conceptual framework should be made which is based on neuroscience
• Phenomenologist • He asserts that the mind-body bifurcation that has been going on for a long time is a futile endeavor and an invalid problem • Mind and body are intertwined
that they cannot be separated
• All experience is embodied • The living body, his thoughts,
emotions, and experiences are all one
MAURICE MERLEAUPONTY (1908-1961)
C C CC C O O OO O N N NN N C C CC C L L LL L U U UU U S S SS S I I I I I O O OO O N N NN N
Philosophers have given us different
ways of philosophically defining the self There are just guides since
ultimately, philosophy wants us to think on our own
SO NOW, HOW WOULD YOU DEFINE YOUR SELF?
R R R R BOOKS: • De Vera-Palean, E. et al. (2018). Introspection: Understanding The (pp. 2-16). Books Atbp. Publishing Corp. E E R E E • Self, Pastor-Alata, E.J. et al. (2018). Understanding The Self, (pp.1-11). F F E F F REX Book Store Publishing. E EF EE R RE R R E ERE E N NE N N C CN C C E ECE E S SE SS REFERENCES FROM THE BOOKS: • Beiharz, Peter, and Trevor Hogan. 2002. Social Self, Global Culture: An Introduction to Sociological Ideas. New York: Oxford University Press. • Chaffee, John. 2015. The Philosopher’s Way: Thinking Critically about Profound Ideas. 5th Ed. Boston: Pearson • Churchland, P.1989. A Neurocomputational Perspective. MIT Press • David, Randolph. 2002. Nation, Self, and Citizenship: An Invitation to Philippine Sociology. Department of Sociology, College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of the Philippines • Descartes, Rene. 2008. Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies. New York: Oxford University Press. • Freud, Sigmund (2015) Retrieved from: http://thecharnelhouse.org/2015/04/22/cartoon-commies/sigmind-freud-2/ • Generi, Jonardon. 2012. The Self: Naturalism , Consciousness, and the First-Person Stance, New York: Oxford University Press. • Hume, David, and Eric Steinberg. 1992. An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding: (with) A Letter from a Gentleman to His Friend in Edinburgh; (and) An Abstract of a Treatise of Human Nature. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing
R R RR E ERE E F FEFF E EF EE R RE R R E ERE E N NE N N C CN C C E ECE E S SE SS
• Locke, John. 1689. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Pennsylvania State. • Mark, J.J. (2009, September 02). Socrates. Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved from: https://www.ancient.eu/socrates/ • Marsella, Anthony J., George A. De Vos, and Francis L. K. Hsu.1985. Culture and Self: Asian and Western Perspectives. London: Tavistock Publications. • Mead, George Herbert, 1934. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. • Nazario, M. (2011). Man is a thinking being. • Plato. 2000. Plato: “The Republic” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Plato. 2017. The Republic. : BookRix. • Rappe, Sara L. 1995. “Socrates and Self-Knowledge.”Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 28 (1):1-23. • Schlenker, Barry R. 1985. The Self and Social Life. New York: McGraw-Hill • Schuler, Ron. (2006). Locke. Retrieved from: http://rsparlourtricks.blogspot.com/2006/08/locke.html • Stevens, Richard. 1996. Understanding the Self. California: SAGE Publications • The Charnel-House (2015). Immanuel Kant. Retrieved from: https://thecharnelhouse.org/2015/04/22/cartoon-commies/sigmund-freud-2/ • Troscianko, J. (2016). Churchland. Retrieved from: http://scfmadrid.wordpress.com/tag/churchland/ • Vlastos G. (1983). “The Socratic Elenchus”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. 1:27-28.
PREPARED & PRESENTED BY:
GROUP 1
OF
BSA 1-1
A M O R A N TO, R O B I E C . H AO, K Y L A O. N A RVA J A , L O U I S E M A E B . N AV E A , J A N E L L A C .